[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Cynowa v. CSSS, et al. -- draft summary judgment reply brief



The word "impute" is correct in the opening paragraph, as that is the word
the case law uses.

Also, I could not see what your change was on p.8.

-----Original Message-----
From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:26 AM
To: kduff@rddlaw.net; lisa@csss.net; slater@billslater.com
Cc: jmurray@rddlaw.net; kpritchard@rddlaw.net
Subject: RE: Cynowa v. CSSS, et al. -- draft summary judgment reply brief

Excellent piece of writing.  I made a couple of minor edits.  

  

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin B. Duff [mailto:kduff@rddlaw.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 3:25 AM
To: haytham@puckettfaraj.com; lisa@csss.net; slater@billslater.com
Cc: jmurray@rddlaw.net; kpritchard@rddlaw.net
Subject: Cynowa v. CSSS, et al. -- draft summary judgment reply brief

Lisa, Bill, and Haytham,

Attached is a draft of our reply brief in support of the motion for summary
judgment.  We will be filing this brief today, March 16, but welcome any
comments you have on it. Please send me your comments by no later than noon.

At present you will note that the brief is a little over 16 pages.  We will
be working this morning to eliminate an extra page to keep the brief within
the 15-page limit.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Kevin



Kevin B. Duff
Rachlis Durham Duff & Adler, LLC
542 South Dearborn Street, Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60605
phone: 312-733-3390
fax: 312-733-3952
mobile: 312-218-8620


RACHLIS DURHAM DUFF & ADLER, LLC E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE  

This transmission may be: (1) subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege, (2)
an attorney work product, or (3) strictly confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or
disseminate this information.  If you have received this in error, please
reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized
interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.