[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Cynowa v. CSSS, et al. -- draft summary judgment reply brief



thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Haytham [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:46 AM
To: Kevin Duff
Subject: Re: Cynowa v. CSSS, et al. -- draft summary judgment reply brief

I didn't make a change to page 8. I was going to add to your argument
regarding absence of malice by arguing that there was a good faith basis for
slater to fear the existence of a gun based on what was known of cynowa at
the time. I changed my mind because I think your argument was sufficient. 

Haytham Faraj 
Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 16, 2011, at 10:36 AM, "Kevin Duff" <kduff@rddlaw.net> wrote:

> The word "impute" is correct in the opening paragraph, as that is the word
> the case law uses.
> 
> Also, I could not see what your change was on p.8.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 9:26 AM
> To: kduff@rddlaw.net; lisa@csss.net; slater@billslater.com
> Cc: jmurray@rddlaw.net; kpritchard@rddlaw.net
> Subject: RE: Cynowa v. CSSS, et al. -- draft summary judgment reply brief
> 
> Excellent piece of writing.  I made a couple of minor edits.  
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin B. Duff [mailto:kduff@rddlaw.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 3:25 AM
> To: haytham@puckettfaraj.com; lisa@csss.net; slater@billslater.com
> Cc: jmurray@rddlaw.net; kpritchard@rddlaw.net
> Subject: Cynowa v. CSSS, et al. -- draft summary judgment reply brief
> 
> Lisa, Bill, and Haytham,
> 
> Attached is a draft of our reply brief in support of the motion for
summary
> judgment.  We will be filing this brief today, March 16, but welcome any
> comments you have on it. Please send me your comments by no later than
noon.
> 
> At present you will note that the brief is a little over 16 pages.  We
will
> be working this morning to eliminate an extra page to keep the brief
within
> the 15-page limit.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
> 
> Kevin
> 
> 
> 
> Kevin B. Duff
> Rachlis Durham Duff & Adler, LLC
> 542 South Dearborn Street, Suite 900
> Chicago, Illinois 60605
> phone: 312-733-3390
> fax: 312-733-3952
> mobile: 312-218-8620
> 
> 
> RACHLIS DURHAM DUFF & ADLER, LLC E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE  
> 
> This transmission may be: (1) subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege,
(2)
> an attorney work product, or (3) strictly confidential. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or
> disseminate this information.  If you have received this in error, please
> reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized
> interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.
> 
>