RE: (Cynowa v. CSSS et al.) Plaintiff's Response Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment

["Kevin Duff" <kduff@rddlaw.net>]

Bill,

Thanks for your email.  The focus for the summary judgment motion is as we
laid it out in our initial filing on January 19.  While the manner in we you
were treated may be helpful to understanding the context of the events at
issue as we prepare for trial, we do not want to interject new material into
the summary judgment analysis because we do not want the Court to conclude
that there is a dispute over the facts that a jury must decide.

I would be happy to discuss this with you tomorrow if you would like to give
me a call.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: William F. Slater, III [mailto:slater@billslater.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 6:12 PM
To: John Murray
Cc: kduff@rddlaw.net; 'Haytham'
Subject: Re: (Cynowa v. CSSS et al.) Plaintiff's Response Brief in
Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment

John,

I have tried to explain in earlier occasions is that the things that
transpired up to and since the termination of Cynowa were a form of
"Workplace Mobbing."  (Them against me)

http://www.mobbing-usa.com/

Cynowa's behavior that led to his termination was his attempt to establish
himself as the leader of the gang there.  And also to show that he had
contempt for CSSS because the previous Program Manager, Larry McKeehan,
who was Chris' good buddy, was fired.

It would be very instructive if you could gather evidence in the form of
e-mails, documents, and depositions, etc. that would show how much I was
hated, and subsequently trashed by these people.  Also go back and look at
the e-mails that I listed in the Appendix of my March 2007 72-page
response to CSSS regarding Nikoforis' Employee Dispute Resolution against
me.  These are e-mails written by the next self-appointed leader of the
gang there.  He wanted to have me kicked out in retaliation for the fact
that Cynowa was fired.

Anyway, you folks need to see what is really going on here and how Cynowa
(and Carver) are using the legal system to finish what they could not
accomplish as a mob in the workplace.

Thanks,

Best regards,

William F. Slater, III, PMP
Chicago, IL
United States of America
slater@billslater.com
http://billslater.com
http://billslater.com/career
773 - 235 - 3080 - Home
312 - 758 - 0307 - Mobile



On Wed, March 2, 2011 4:32 pm, John Murray wrote:
> All:
>
>
>
> Attached please find a copy of the Plaintiff's Response Brief in
> Opposition
> to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.  We will begin on our reply
> brief in short order.  Please see attached.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> John E. Murray, Esq.
>
> Associate Attorney
>
> Rachlis Durham Duff & Adler, LLC
>
> 542 South Dearborn Street, Suite 900
>
> Chicago, IL 60605
>
> Office: (312) 733-3950
>
> Direct: (312) 275-0338
>
> Mobile: (810) 824-7197
>
> Fax: (312) 733-3952
>
> Email: jmurray@rddlaw.net
>
> Firm website: www.rddlaw.net
>
>
>
> RACHLIS DURHAM DUFF & ADLER, LLC E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>
> This transmission may be: (1) subject to the Attorney-Client Privilege,
> (2)
> an attorney work product, or (3) strictly confidential. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or
> disseminate this information. If you have received this in error, please
> reply and notify the sender (only) and delete the message. Unauthorized
> interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law.
>
>
>
>