Joe Lisiâs letter is excellent. I hope Iâll have an opportunity to meet him one day. He is a great friend to you.
Donâtâ worry about any of this derailing the NJP. The only way it can be derailed is through you and frankly I donât care if it does. As I told you before. They may not accept it anyway because they donât want to hear the truth. That said, I think an NJP is a good hedge.
From: Pietro Scarselli [mailto:scarselli13@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:29 AM
To: haythem faraj; Hur Capt Christian P
Cc: farajh@gmail.com
Subject: the LISI letter
Gentlemen, attached is the letter Joe LISI composed on my behalf. I ask you to review it b/c I am now always concerned about any specifics of the charges that may be included in any letter presented to the CG...that it does not compromise its credibility (giving an impression that I influenced the respective author(s) with my version of the events/facts, etc)...and that it does not have a reverse affect on the SJA/CG, like you have both described to me (WRT my own personal statement, which I near done revising accordingly). If I understood both of you correctly WRT the KNOBEL letter, it good to go, (with the two sentences deleted)...in other words, unlikely to drive the CG to resend it to a GCM (b/c it does not weaken the guilty pleas, etc)...correct? BECK and HUMBERTSON's letter are written in the same light/manner as KNOBELs...so I'd like to send them to you later when I get them to double check you are both comfortable with them and their potential affect (or not) on the CG (and SJA). As always I appreciate y'alls time and advise/assitance. S/F!
Pietro
R/
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "jlisi17173@aol.com" <jlisi17173@aol.com>
To: scarselli13@yahoo.com
Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 6:19:00 PM
Subject: Gen Clardy Letter revised.
Major: Open the attachment and read. Let me know if it is acceptable. S/f JL
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Donna P. <djohnson@stroock.com>
To: 'jlisi17173@aol.com' <jlisi17173@aol.com>
Sent: Mon, Nov 29, 2010 6:03 pm
Joe you can forward this as is now.
Love JPOD
IRS Circular 230
Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS in Circular 230, we inform you that any tax
advice contained in this communication (including any attachment that does not explicitly state otherwise) is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal
Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.