[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scarselli Billing

To: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
Subject: Re: Scarselli Billing
From: Atwood Marcelyn <marcy@puckettfaraj.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:24:28 -0500
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: domain of transitioning marcy@puckettfaraj.com does not designate 76.96.62.16 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=marcy@puckettfaraj.com
Delivered-to: haytham@puckettfaraj.com
In-reply-to: <039101cb81f6$0de12d30$29a38790$@com>
References: <4E17944A-E8D2-4EA2-89EE-30EC25AAB75C@puckettfaraj.com> <039101cb81f6$0de12d30$29a38790$@com>

No, thank you. Today for the first time since April, I feel like there is a handle on at least one attorney's billing. I appreciate the rewrite on Esparza's too. Thanks!

On Nov 11, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Haytham Faraj wrote:

Rgr. thanks

From: Atwood Marcelyn [mailto:marcy@puckettfaraj.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 6:12 PM
To: Faraj Haytham
Cc: Nicholson Kenneth
Subject: Scarselli Billing

H, this goes to the office tomorrow to be mailed and Emailed.

Nick, e-trons attached.
M

References:
- Scarselli Billing
  - From: Atwood Marcelyn <marcy@puckettfaraj.com>

Prev by Date: Natividad Expenses Amtrak in August?
Next by Date: Fwd: HF Client Financial Summary as of 11Nov10
Previous by thread: Scarselli Billing
Next by thread: Re: San Diego coordination
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread