[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bubbles answered
I found a partial transcript of that hearing that's very helpful. (It
was part of the second Article 62 appeal litigation.) I'm going to
make some revisions in light of that transcript.
Semper Fi,
DHS
-----Original Message-----
From: Puckett Neal <neal@puckettfaraj.com>
To: dhsullivan@aol.com
Cc: CODE NAMARA 45 Sripinyo Kirk Major <kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil>; Faraj
Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
Sent: Thu, Nov 4, 2010 2:39 pm
Subject: Re: bubbles answered
Yes. ÂYou're right. ÂIt could be that we were there. ÂBut there was no
inquiry with Wuterich re: counsel.
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566
www.puckettfaraj.comÂ
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential,
and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If
you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby
notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this
communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at
888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.ÂÂYou are required to
purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or
distribution.
On Nov 4, 2010, at 11:34 AM, dhsullivan@aol.com wrote:
This is from NMCCA's second opinion:
CBS produced the outtakes for the military judge on 11 March 2009.
Record at 20.
United States v. Wuterich, 68 M.J. 511, 513 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 2009).
ÂDidn't Meeks then hold an Article 39(a) session during which he ruled
that there was a newsgatherer's privilege?
Semper Fi,
DHS
-----Original Message-----
From: Puckett Neal <neal@puckettfaraj.com>
To: dhsullivan@aol.com
Cc: Faraj Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>; CODE Sripinyo Kirk
Major NAMARA 45 <kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil>
Sent: Thu, Nov 4, 2010 2:20 pm
Subject: Re: bubbles answered
Pretty sure it was 2010 vice 2009. ÂThere was no hearing in Mar 2009.
ÂColby was not on the record until after the second appeal, I think.
ÂLet's check Haytham's recollection of this.
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566
www.puckettfaraj.comÂ
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential,
and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If
you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby
notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this
communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at
888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.ÂÂYou are required to
purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or
distribution.
On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:48 AM, dhsullivan@aol.com wrote:
Neal -- at one point in the brief, we say:
On March 22, 2009 â after the Governmentâs first Article 62 appeal but
before its second â an Article 39(a) session was held to hear motions.
ÂLtCol Vokey (Ret.) and Maj Faraj (Ret.) were both present as civilian
counsel, though neither filed a notice of appearance. ÂThe military
judge, LtCol Meeks, made no inquiry concerning either LtCol Vokeyâs or
Maj Farajâs changed status.
Is that right? ÂIf so, would that be Colby's first post-retirment
Article 39(a)?
Semper Fi,
Dwight
-----Original Message-----
From: Puckett Neal <neal@puckettfaraj.com>
To: Sullivan Dwight <dwight.sullivan@pentagon.af.mil>; Sullivan
Dwight <DHSULLIVAN@aol.com>
Cc: CODE Major NAMARA 45 Sripinyo Kirk <kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil>;
Faraj Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
Sent: Thu, Nov 4, 2010 1:40 pm
Subject: bubbles answered
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566
www.puckettfaraj.comÂ
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential,
and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If
you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby
notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this
communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at
888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.ÂÂYou are required to
purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or
distribution.
=
=
=