Re: bubbles answered

[dhsullivan@aol.com]

This is from the 11 March 2009 hearing:

MJ:  All right.  Also representing previously as a, I believe, detailed 
defense counsel was Lieutenant Colonel Vokey.  My understanding is that 
Lieutenant Colonel Vokey has since retired from the Marine Corps, is 
that correct?
DC (LtCol Tafoya):  Thatâs correct, Your Honor.
MJ:  There has been some discussion that he may be retained in this 
case in the capacity as civilian counsel, but that has not occurred, is 
that correct?
DC (LtCol Tafoya):  Thatâs correct, Your Honor.

So was Colby's first post-retirement appearance in the case in 2010?

Semper Fi,
DHS

-----Original Message-----
From: Puckett Neal <neal@puckettfaraj.com>
To: dhsullivan@aol.com
Cc: Faraj Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>; CODE Sripinyo Kirk Major 
NAMARA 45 <kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil>
Sent: Thu, Nov 4, 2010 2:20 pm
Subject: Re: bubbles answered

Pretty sure it was 2010 vice 2009. ÂThere was no hearing in Mar 2009. 
ÂColby was not on the record until after the second appeal, I think. 
ÂLet's check Haytham's recollection of this.
Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566
www.puckettfaraj.comÂ


The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, 
and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If 
you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby 
notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this 
communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 
888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.ÂÂYou are required to 
purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or 
distribution.










On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:48 AM, dhsullivan@aol.com wrote:
Neal -- at one point in the brief, we say:

On March 22, 2009 â after the Governmentâs first Article 62 appeal but 
before its second â an Article 39(a) session was held to hear motions. 
ÂLtCol Vokey (Ret.) and Maj Faraj (Ret.) were both present as civilian 
counsel, though neither filed a notice of appearance. ÂThe military 
judge, LtCol Meeks, made no inquiry concerning either LtCol Vokeyâs or 
Maj Farajâs changed status.

Is that right? ÂIf so, would that be Colby's first post-retirment 
Article 39(a)?

Semper Fi,
Dwight

-----Original Message-----
From: Puckett Neal &lt;neal@puckettfaraj.com&gt;
To: Sullivan Dwight &lt;dwight.sullivan@pentagon.af.mil&gt;; Sullivan 
Dwight &lt;DHSULLIVAN@aol.com&gt;
Cc: CODE Major NAMARA 45 Sripinyo Kirk &lt;kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil&gt;; 
Faraj Haytham &lt;haytham@puckettfaraj.com&gt;
Sent: Thu, Nov 4, 2010 1:40 pm
Subject: bubbles answered

Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.706.9566
www.puckettfaraj.comÂ


The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, 
and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If 
you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby 
notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this 
communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 
888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.ÂÂYou are required to 
purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or 
distribution.

=




=