Haytham, I definitely feel like taking the Westlaw training yesterday was worth it, I learned a lot even if I was unsuccessful in the search. To me this means you are in the process of defining a new area of law, pretty exciting! Please let me know if you need me to start working on anything else. Bethany -----Original Message----- From: Haytham [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 18:09 To: Trujillo Sgt Bethany N Subject: Re: Issue to be researched Bethany. Don't be sorry. I ran the same searches on lexis yesterday. Also no luck. At least you learned to do searches :) next step writing :) Haytham Faraj 760-521-7934 Sent from my iPhone On Sep 22, 2010, at 7:57 PM, "Trujillo Sgt Bethany N" <bethany.trujillo@usmc.mil> wrote: > Haytham, > > I'm not having any luck with my search, I have tried a plethora of searches and I am not finding any case law on "if the convening authority engaging in UCI by allowing the detailed defense counsel to leave while keeping the prosecution team intact." > > I have tried using both natural language searches and terms & connector searches. > > I ran the following searches and variations of each and came up with nothing. > > unlawful command influence & loss of counsel > convening authority interference with defense counsel > convening authority, UCI, government special treatment > improper severance of relationship by government, UCI > UCI, government preferential treatment, convening authority > > Can you suggest any other language that may improve my results? > > I apologize that this is taking so long, but I am not finding anything relevant to the search you requested. Any assistance you can offer would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > Bethany > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Haytham [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:14 > To: Trujillo Sgt Bethany N > Subject: Re: Issue to be researched > > Call me 760 521 7934 > > Haytham Faraj > 760-521-7934 > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 22, 2010, at 12:44 PM, "Trujillo Sgt Bethany N" <bethany.trujillo@usmc.mil> wrote: > >> Haytham, >> >> I am open to any suggestions that you have on how to frame my search as well as any pointers you may have. >> >> Bethany >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 5:57 >> To: Trujillo Sgt Bethany N >> Subject: Issue to be researched >> >> Bethany, >> >> Here's the issue I'd like you to look into. If you're not sure how to frame your search let me know and I can assist. >> >> >> >> Whether a convening authority engages in unlawful command influence when he allows detailed defense counsel to leave a case while keeping prosecutors on the case. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> >> >> Haytham Faraj, Esq. >> >> PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC >> >> _______________________ >> >> WASHINGTON DC METRO >> >> 1800 Diagonal Road >> >> Suite 210 >> >> Alexandria, VA 22314 >> >> 703-706-0442 Phone >> >> >> >> DETROIT METRO >> >> 6200 Schaefer Road >> >> Suite 202 >> >> Dearborn, MI 48126 >> >> 313-457-1390 Phone >> >> 202-280-1039 Fax >> >> >> >> www.puckettfaraj.com <http://www.puckettfaraj.com/> >> >> >> >> The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. >> >> >>
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature