|
Oorah!
In a message dated 9/7/2010 7:20:19 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
haytham@puckettfaraj.com writes:
He
gave the Government the continuance. Itâs David Jones. I feel like
he will not rule for us on the Hutchins motion despite the strength of the
issue. I feel like I need to tighten up the facts more. Iâll call
you late next week to share some ideas with you if you donât mind making some
time for us. Your advice about not painting the judge into a dismissal
only corner was very important. That allows him to punt it to the
Government for a fix.
Haytham
Faraj, Esq.
PUCKETT
& FARAJ, PC
_______________________
WASHINGTON
DC METRO
1800
Diagonal Road
Suite
210
Alexandria,
VA 22314
703-706-0442
Phone
DETROIT
METRO
6200
Schaefer Road
Suite
202
Dearborn,
MI 48126
313-457-1390
Phone
202-280-1039
Fax
www.puckettfaraj.com
The
information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is
intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not
the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use,
distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett
& Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to
sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without
reading or making any copy or distribution.
From:
DHSULLIVAN@aol.com [mailto:DHSULLIVAN@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday,
September 07, 2010 7:16 PM
To: ray.slabbekorn@usmc.mil;
haytham@puckettfaraj.com
Cc:
joseph.grimm@usmc.mil
Subject: Re: Lawfulness of a General
Order
How
did the military judge rule? (And who was the military
judge?)
In a
message dated 9/7/2010 3:09:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
ray.slabbekorn@usmc.mil writes:
Gentlemen,
Glad
to see Col Sullivan answered the question about general order
signatory. Yancey Ellis argued this issue (as a DC) a couple of weeks
ago regarding the lawfulness of a general order prohibiting spice use.
I have his civilian contact info if you need it. I would hit him up
about his approach.
V/R
Capt Slabbekorn
-----Original
Message-----
From: dhsullivan@aol.com [mailto:dhsullivan@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 6:21
To:
haytham@puckettfaraj.com
Cc: Slabbekorn Capt Ray B Jr; Grimm Capt Joseph
I
Subject: Re: Lawfulness of a General Order
Negative -- what's
the basis?
Semper fi,
DHS
-----Original
Message-----
From: Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
To:
dhsullivan@aol.com <dhsullivan@aol.com>
Cc: ray.slabbekorn@usmc.mil
<ray.slabbekorn@usmc.mil>; joseph.grimm@usmc.mil
<joseph.grimm@usmc.mil>
Sent: Tue, Sep 7, 2010 9:08 am
Subject:
Re: Lawfulness of a General Order
Thank you. Didn't you hear about
the government's request for a continuance of 6 weeks?
Haytham
Faraj
760-521-7934
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:57
AM, dhsullivan@aol.com wrote:
> There's a fairly recent NMCCA
unpublished opinion on this. An order
was signed by the deputy
chief of staff and didn't indicate that it was signed by direction.
NMCCA held it wasn't a general order.
>
> The case name is
United States v. Sheley. Here's a link:
>
>
http://www.jag.navy.mil/courts/documents/archive/2008/SHELEY,%20R.S.%20%20200800396%20UNPUB.pdf
>
>
-----Original Message-----
> From: Haytham Faraj
<haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
> To: dhsullivan@aol.com
> Cc:
'Slabbekorn Capt Ray B Jr' <ray.slabbekorn@usmc.mil>; 'Grimm
Capt
Joseph I' <joseph.grimm@usmc.mil>
> Sent: Tue, Sep 7,
2010 8:10 am
> Subject: Lawfulness of a General Order
>
>
Col Sullivan,I have a question that despite researching I could
not
quitefind a clear answer to. Does a purported General Order
signed by a Chief ofStaff who is not a GCMCA a lawful General Order?
Based on my reading ofArticle 92 it seems to require the signor to be a flag
officer or an GCMCA. Any advice or recommendations you have are appreciated.
Haytham Faraj, Esq.PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC_______________________WASHINGTON
DC METRO1800 Diagonal RoadSuite 210Alexandria, VA 22314703-706-0442 Phone
DETROIT METRO6200 Schaefer RoadSuite 202Dearborn, MI 48126 313-457-1390
Phone202-280-1039 Fax www.puckettfaraj.com The informationcontained in this
electronic message is confidential, and is intended for theuse of the
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intendedrecipient of
this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution,copying of
disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If youreceived this
communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj,
P.C.at
888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You
arerequired to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any
copy
ordistribution.
>
|