[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Lawfulness of a General Order



His cell # is 703-585-7039.  Although I thought I did, I in fact do not have a civilian email address for him.  Give him a call, Sir.

V/R
Capt Slabbekorn

-----Original Message-----
From: Haytham [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 12:50
To: Slabbekorn Capt Ray B Jr
Subject: Re: Lawfulness of a General Order

Please email me Elliss' contact info. 

Haytham Faraj
760-521-7934
Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 7, 2010, at 2:47 PM, "Slabbekorn Capt Ray B Jr" <ray.slabbekorn@usmc.mil> wrote:

> Gentlemen,
> 
> Glad to see Col Sullivan answered the question about general order signatory.  Yancey Ellis argued this issue (as a DC) a couple of weeks ago regarding the lawfulness of a general order prohibiting spice use.  I have his civilian contact info if you need it.  I would hit him up about his approach.
> 
> V/R
> Capt Slabbekorn
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhsullivan@aol.com [mailto:dhsullivan@aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 6:21
> To: haytham@puckettfaraj.com
> Cc: Slabbekorn Capt Ray B Jr; Grimm Capt Joseph I
> Subject: Re: Lawfulness of a General Order
> 
> Negative -- what's the basis?
> 
> Semper fi,
> DHS
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
> To: dhsullivan@aol.com <dhsullivan@aol.com>
> Cc: ray.slabbekorn@usmc.mil <ray.slabbekorn@usmc.mil>; 
> joseph.grimm@usmc.mil <joseph.grimm@usmc.mil>
> Sent: Tue, Sep 7, 2010 9:08 am
> Subject: Re: Lawfulness of a General Order
> 
> Thank you. Didn't you hear about the government's request for a continuance of 6 weeks?
> 
> Haytham Faraj
> 760-521-7934
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:57 AM, dhsullivan@aol.com wrote:
> 
>> There's a fairly recent NMCCA unpublished opinion on this.  An order
> was signed by the deputy chief of staff and didn't indicate that it was signed by direction.  NMCCA held it wasn't a general order.
>> 
>> The case name is United States v. Sheley.  Here's a link:
>> 
>> 
> http://www.jag.navy.mil/courts/documents/archive/2008/SHELEY,%20R.S.%2
> 0%20200800396%20UNPUB.pdf
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
>> To: dhsullivan@aol.com
>> Cc: 'Slabbekorn Capt Ray B Jr' <ray.slabbekorn@usmc.mil>; 'Grimm Capt
> Joseph I' <joseph.grimm@usmc.mil>
>> Sent: Tue, Sep 7, 2010 8:10 am
>> Subject: Lawfulness of a General Order
>> 
>> Col Sullivan,I have a question that despite researching I could not
> quitefind a clear answer to.  Does a purported General Order signed by 
> a Chief ofStaff who is not a GCMCA a lawful General Order?  Based on 
> my reading ofArticle 92 it seems to require the signor to be a flag 
> officer or an GCMCA. Any advice or recommendations you have are 
> appreciated. Haytham Faraj, Esq.PUCKETT & FARAJ, 
> PC_______________________WASHINGTON DC METRO1800 Diagonal RoadSuite 
> 210Alexandria, VA 22314703-706-0442 Phone DETROIT METRO6200 Schaefer 
> RoadSuite 202Dearborn, MI 48126 313-457-1390 Phone202-280-1039 Fax 
> www.puckettfaraj.com The informationcontained in this electronic 
> message is confidential, and is intended for theuse of the individual 
> or entity named above. If you are not the intendedrecipient of this 
> message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution,copying of 
> disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If 
> youreceived this communication in error, please notify Puckett & 
> Faraj, P.C.at
> 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You arerequired to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy ordistribution.
>> 
> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature