RE: Witness Production Conversation of 20100827 (U.S. v. SSgt Wuterich)

["Brower Capt Matthew R" <matthew.r.brower@usmc.mil>]

Thanks Sir.

V/R

Capt Brower 

-----Original Message-----
From: Haytham [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 15:32
To: Brower Capt Matthew R
Cc: <neal@puckettfaraj.com>; <cvokey@fhsulaw.com>; Marshall Maj Meridith L; Gannon Maj Nicholas L; Sullivan LtCol Sean
Subject: Re: Witness Production Conversation of 20100827 (U.S. v. SSgt Wuterich)

Capt Brower,
Correct on all except SSgt   We do want him. I misspoke when I listed him as a not needed. We do in fact want him. 

Haytham Faraj
760-521-7934
Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 27, 2010, at 5:41 PM, "Brower Capt Matthew R" <matthew.r.brower@usmc.mil> wrote:

> Gentlemen, and Ma'am,
>     This e-mail is being sent to memorialize that Mr. Haytham and Major Gannon in the presence of Mr. Vokey and myself had a conversation about the following witnesses whom Mr. Haytham stated the defense would no longer be requesting at the trial in this case:
> 
> -Rene Rodriguez
> 
> -Brian D. Whitt
> 
> -Martha Ann Noonan
> 
> -Jerrett Bilski
> 
> -Major Dana Haytt
> 
> -MSgt Dunlap
> 
> -SSgt Laughner
> 
> -LCol Jeffrey Chessani
> 
> -Neller
> 
> Please let me know if any of this information is incorrect or if there was a misunderstanding on anyone's part about the defense no longer requesting these witnesses.  Thanks.
> 
> Very Respectfully,
> 
> Matthew Brower
> Captain, USMC