[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Witness issues ICO US v. Wacker



I'm coordinating with Doug on this.

Christian P. Hur
Captain, USMC
Senior Defense Counsel
Telephone:  (619) 524-8713
Fax:  (619) 524-6784
Address:  Defense Section, Bldg 12, 1st Floor, MCRD, San Diego, CA 92140

This email may contain Attorney Work Product.  Please delete if you received
this message in error.
  


-----Original Message-----
From: Haytham [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 15:16
To: Day Capt Evan S
Cc: Hur Capt Christian P; Hatch MAJ Douglas C; Douvas Capt Alex G; Sullivan LtCol Sean
Subject: Re: Witness issues ICO US v. Wacker

Capt Day,
That's a fair request. We'll provide the Witness information and affidavit. 

Haytham Faraj 
760-521-7934
Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 23, 2010, at 1:04 PM, "Day Capt Evan S" <evan.s.day@usmc.mil> wrote:

> Gentlemen,
> 
> I have a couple of issues regarding witnesses that I'd like to see if we can resolve without litigation.
> 
> One is that Susan Minamizono, who the defense has requested, has a baby due shortly before the trial dates.  I'd like to arrange some kind of alternative to testimony for her, and I'm open to reasonable suggestions as there are multiple alternatives with the consent of both parties (stipulation, phone testimony, affidavit, deposition, etc.).  If we can't agree on anything, then I will probably submit a motion for a deposition.
> 
> The second issue relates to character witnesses.  As you probably recall, I denied the vast majority of the character witnesses in the defense witness request.  I'm going to reiterate what I said in my original response and state that the government is willing to re-evaluate the request for production of a reasonable number of character witnesses, provided that the defense provides an adequate proffer showing, among other things, current (and verified) contact information, that the defense has actually contacted these witnesses (or made diligent efforts to), some evidence that they would testify as proffered (e.g. statement from the witness), and some explanation for why particular witnesses are not cumulative with other witnesses.  I'm assuming that you will be filing some sort of motion to compel witnesses, so we can probably avoid some time litigating the issue.
> 
> Very Respectfully,
> Captain Evan S. Day
> Trial Counsel, Military Justice Office
> Joint Law Center
> 3rd MAW/ MCAS Miramar
> Comm: 858-577-1887
> DSN: 312-267-1887
> Fax: 858-577-1734
> 
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//LIMDIS
> This e-mail is FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY and is exempt from mandatory disclosure under FOIA. DoD 5400.7R, "DoD Freedom of Information Act Program", DoD Directive 5230.9, "Clearance of DoD Information for Public Release", and DoD Instruction 5230.29,  and "Security and Policy Review of DoD Information for Public Release".
> ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION OR ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT. The information contained in this message is privileged. It is intended only to be read by the individual or entity addressed or their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form, is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature