Brother, also...this continuance crap is another ploy. The government has had ample time to get the members set up. Not our fault they waited until the 11th hour. Moving this thing to Nov (Glinsky said Sep/Oct??) is another way to try to break my unbreakable resolve! Moreover...well, I'll save this comment for when we talk. I know you know all this, but I just have to vent...so please bear with... 1) Judge still needs to know that Montes was NJPd for a year + old, unrelated to any investigations he underwent, charge...that normally we go unpunished (or NPLOC'd at best) same day Scammon was relieved. We can prove this by HQBN's NJP track record. 2) Scammon relief is looked at for his other actions not related to the case 3) the bell has been rung and cannot be "unrung" ...how can we measure who we've lost??...EAS, PCS, others who are still here but were afraid to step fwd and still are afraid. The letter cant fix this 4) Blyther - still afraid? 5) continuance is only in the interest of the government. Not in the interest of justice or my rights. 6) what repercussions is Gilinsky and Gill facing now for their perjury? S/F! R/ Pietro The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. -----Original Message----- From: Scarselli Maj Pietro P Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 13:30 To: 'Haytham Faraj' Subject: RE: Scarselli Letter Brother, as you know this letter is far from adequate and how shall one truly test the affects of it against the proven UCI. WRT a continuance, I know I am the accuse, but for justice sake...how much longer do I need to be dragged through the mud. Further a continuance also exacerbates the selection delay of my promotion. Is there no interest of justice? Does due process simply begin and end with the 120 day rule from article 32 to arraignment? Lastly, would you mind forwarding me the email from the military judge stating his position? Thanks for all. Semper Fidelis! R/ Pietro The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. -----Original Message----- From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:54 To: Scarselli Maj Pietro P Subject: FW: Scarselli Letter -----Original Message----- From: Gilinsky Capt David [mailto:david.gilinsky@usmc.mil] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 5:13 PM To: Faraj, Haytham; Hur Capt Christian P; Rubin LtCol Peter R Cc: Wareham Capt Jason R Subject: Scarselli Letter Gentlemen, Attached, please find the Commanding General's letter to the Marines of PMO via the CO of HQBN. It will be briefed to them at an all hands meeting by the Provost Marshal, Major Jones. MSgt Scamman has been placed on PTAD away from PMO for a minimum of 30 days pending a Command Investigation, and will not contact any Marines at the Provost Marshal's Office. V/R Capt D. Gilinsky Trial Counsel/Legal Assistance Attorney Office of the Staff Judge Advocate 29 Palms, CA (760) 830-9077
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature