[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Policy ignoring racism and hateful speech directed at Ismail Abu Hayyeh (an 11 year old child)



That is great, I think you would be great for the case. ÂI will e-mail you a summary my associate wrote up.Â
We do have the support of DOJ on this case as well.

Which number should I give her? ÂThis all happened within the past week.

Thanks,

AbedÂ

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:

I would love to take the police brutality case in St. Louis. Please give me some facts. I have a colleague that can sponsor a pro hoc petition for me. This would be a contingency case. The victim will not have to pay until we collect.

Â

With respect to the email this morning, it is just an FYI. You will also receive a letter on Monday which is essentially the same thing. I will let you know if I need your heavy artillery.

Â

From: Abed Ayoub [mailto:abedayoub@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 1:47 PM
To: Haytham Faraj
Subject: Re: Policy ignoring racism and hateful speech directed at Ismail Abu Hayyeh (an 11 year old child)

Â

This is very troubling. ÂPlease let me know how ADC can help. ÂI am willing to send a letter of support early

next week, hopefully by Monday afternoon. ÂLet me know what you think. ÂI have a case out of the St. Louis

region involving serious policeÂbrutality. ÂDo you know of an attorney in the area that could pick up the case?

I want to find someone for the family ASAP. Â

Â

Thanks,Â

Â

-Abed

2010/5/14 Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>

Mr. Tim Green

Dean of Students

Conrady Junior High School

7825 West 103rd Street

Palos Hills, IL 60465

Â

Dear Dean Green:

I have been retained as counsel by the Abu Hayyeh family to assist them in the matter of their son Ismail Abu Hayyeh. Ismail is a student at your school. As you are well aware you have suspended Ismail on five different occasions for incidents involving altercations with other students. I have interviewed Ismail to understand the facts. I have also discussed the matter with Ismailâs parents. According to Ismail and his parents âwho were briefed by you- all the altercations except one, were initiated by other kids who initially made racist or hateful comments to Ismail because he is an Arab and Muslim. ÂOn one occasion a fight ensued after a boy pulled Ismailâs pants down in a locker room. That incident did not involve racist on hateful comments. Nonetheless, on all occasions you decided to suspend Ismail from the school. I recognize that you must be busy and that you have a school to run. It is unconscionable, however, that in 2010 we continue to allow racist as well as ethnically and religiously hateful comments to go unpunished in our schools. What is more troubling is that you endorse the racist speech by failing to punish it based on a specious policy that suspends the victim if the response to the hateful speech is physical. ÂA policy that suspends a child who becomes angry at being called a âterroristâ and who defends himself when another boy assaults him by pulling down his pants is no policy at all. It ignores the aggressor and punishes the victim.Â

Â

When one person, without consent or a valid reason, attempts âby force- to remove the pants of another, it is an assault and battery and perhaps even an attempted sexual assault. By suspending Ismail, the victim, you endorsed the conduct. Instead of protecting the victim and punching the aggressor, you punished the victim for defending himself. What would your decision have been if the victim were a girl at your school? Ismail is no less a victim because he is a boy than if he were a girl.

Â

Likewise, if the racially offensive language directed at Ismail were racially offensive language directed at an African-American child, I am certain that you would not have suspended the African-American child for responding, even if that response were physical. Yet, in Ismailâs case, you chose to suspend him because he behaved like a child who had been gravely hurt by hateful speech. Perhaps Ismail becomes enraged at the hate he must suffer at your school because of your inaction or, more specifically, your dubious policy that protects the racist speech while victimizing the victim by suspending him from the school.

Â

The Abu Hayyeh family corresponded with you a few months ago regarding this matter. ÂTheir correspondence went unanswered. I hope you will give this email its due attention. ÂOn behalf of the family I request the following:

1.ÂÂÂÂÂÂ ÂA meeting with you and members of your District 117 Board of Education to address this matter.

2.ÂÂÂÂÂÂ A review of your policy that suspends victims of aggressive or racist behavior who exercise their right to self defense.

3.ÂÂÂÂÂÂ A review of Ismail Abu Hayyehâs record and a reconsideration of your suspension decisions to expunge the record of any suspensions that resulted from Ismailâs response to hateful speech or through the exercise of his right to self defense.

Â

I will follow up this email with a letter to your office, the members of the District 117 Board of Education as well as courtesy copies to the Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights, the American Civil Liberties Union and the American-Arab Anti Discrimination Committee. It is not my intent to enter into litigation. That would not serve Ismailâs interests nor the interests of the children at your school. It is my intent, however, to persuade you to change your policies that coddle racism and hateful speech. Such a policy change would be in the best interests of all the children at your school, including Ismail. To that end, I am prepared to undertake all means available to protect Ismail and other children at Conrady Junior High School from suffering racist actions and speech.

Â

Sincerely,

Â

Haytham Faraj, Esq.

PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC

WASHINGTON DC× ÂSAN DIEGO ×ÂDEARBORN

www.puckettfaraj.com

888.970.0005 Toll Free

760-521-7934 Direct Line

202.280.1039 Fax

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.ÂÂYou are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

Â

Â