I went through all of the notes yesterday and flagged, highlighted, and left post-it note comments in a binder Chris has.
Interestingly, I believe we also asked for this same material after charges were originally referred. I'm just seeing a disgusting lack of care, diligence, and professionalism by all individuals representing the government at every level.
S/F
Doug
On Apr 10, 2010 5:15 AM, "Haytham Faraj" <haytham@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:
Doug:
I am very interested on your views on these notes and analysis you have. These should have been turned in a long time ago. Brady, however, does not require their release. Brady requires the release of exculpatory material before trial. It has no effect at the Article 32 stage. The Rules for Court Martial are for more liberal regarding discovery than any Federal rules or case law.
From: Douglas Wacker [mailto:douglas.wacker@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 10:16 PM
To: Haytham Faraj; Hur Capt Christian P; Christian Hur
Subject: Fwd: FW: Discovery ICO U.S. v. Wacker
Gentlemen,
Fascinating how we asked for these notes before the last Art 32 hearing... again be...