Re: Must Talk about Changes to Fee Agreements

[Neal Puckett <neal@puckettfaraj.com>]

Concur.

Neal A. Puckett
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 30, 2010, at 10:33 AM, MA <marcy@puckettfaraj.com> wrote:

> N/H, here is a fee agreement for a new client (not an old Tully  
> client).  It is an on-going retainer with another firm.  Eric took  
> the Flat Fee agreement and changed it.  The red lettering is my  
> input to ensure that besides asking for this former recruiter's  
> research on the Services admininstrative processes and providing  
> that and charging $150; any other items this investigative service  
> has for understanding military law is at the normal attorney rates.   
> Additionally, everything in blue requires a process change on the  
> way the business runs.  Process, policy, method, documentation must  
> all be adapted.
>
> Additionally, since there are now 3 attorneys soon to be 4.  It  
> would be easier to manage if all attorneys used the same contract  
> templates.  Therefore, am seeking concurrence on the format,  
> processes and procedures described and changes to the business  
> management functions that will be required.
>
> Please... We must get this straightened out sooner than later.  The  
> amount of work to manage each individual contract and do some  
> procedures for some clients and not for others is now too hard to  
> do.  Puckett & Faraj now has 71 Clients.
>
> Please advise.
> M
>
> <NOLA Fee Advance.doc>