by Nathaniel R. Helms | August 14, 2010
One month from now the longest, most expensive criminal
investigation in Marine Corps history will finally come to an end one way or
another at the general court martial of SSgt Frank Wuterich, the last Marine
accused of unlawful killings at Haditha, Iraq on November 19, 2005.
ÃâÅWhen the public sees the
truth at this court-martial, it will be one of the biggest news stories of
the year,Ãâ said Neal Puckett, the lead defense attorney in the upcoming
court martial. ÃâÅThe truth of the story is yet to be revealed.ÃâÂ
Almost five years ago, a
hidden insurgent remotely triggered a huge bomb that blew apart a lightly
armored Marine Corps ÃâÅhigh backÃâ Humvee. One Marine and 24 Iraqis died in
the gruesome exchange that followed. Eleven Marines were wounded. The
virulent press dubbed the incident the ÃâÅHaditha Massacre.ÃâÂ
Nine of the decedents were
quickly deemed insurgents for their complicity in staging the attack from a
residential neighborhood. The rest of the victims unfortunately got in the
way. The Marines Corps declared victory the next day in a bland communiquÃÂ. Regrettably
it was factually wrong, the first of many factual and procedural mistakes
that would follow. The Marine Corps has been on trial ever since. On
September 13 it will have one more shot at vindication.
During an interview on the CBS television news
show ÃâÅ60 MinutesÃâ Wuterich revealed what happened that day:
ÃâÂI remember there may have been women in
there, may have been children in there. My responsibility as a squad leader
is to make sure that none of the rest of my guys died ... and at that point,
we were still on the assault, so no, I don't believe [I should have stopped
the attack].
We went through that house much the same,
prepping the room with grenades, going in there, and eliminating the threat
and engaging the targetsÃâÂThere probably wasn't [a threat], now that I look
back on it. But there, in that time, yes, I believed there was a threat.
At his preliminary hearing two years ago
Wuterich said he regretted the loss of civilian life in Haditha, but said he
believed he was operating within military combat rules when he ordered his
men to attack.
What happened
didn't mean there was criminal intent
Puckett has represented the 30-year old infantryman he calls
ÃâÅthe last Marine standingÃâ since 2006. Funded by almost a quarter of a
million dollars from generous donors, he has never given an inch. Convicting
Wuterich would give the Marine Corps prosecutors who relentlessly pursued his
client a scrap of absolution. Puckett doesnÃâât intend to provide the Marine
Corps vindication that easily, he said.
ÃâÅThey were acting in accordance with their training. If errors
in judgment were made, you have to give the benefit of the doubt to the
Marines. What happened [at Haditha] doesnÃâât mean there was criminal intent,ÃâÂ
Puckett explained.
He says the investigation was
flawed, the prosecution ignored exculpatory evidence uncovered by the Naval
Criminal Investigative Service, and his client was the victim of undue
command influence, the same judicial stain that set WuterichÃââs commanding
officer free last month.
Wuterich is charged with
voluntary manslaughter, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment,
dereliction of duty and obstruction of justice for leading the squad that
killed the Iraqis. He was the squad leader in Kilo Company, 3 Battalion, 1st Marines who lead three of his men on
a house clearing attack after his four vehicle resupply convoy was
ambushed. He is currently assigned to administrative work at 1st Marine
Division headquarters at Camp Pendleton. The young Marine who put his future
on hold to defend his country has already lost more than most; his wife, his
family, and his home. The Marine Corps still wants his life. If convicted
Wuterich could spend most of it in prison.
Vast powers of the government versus one Marine
Wuterich has already overcome tremendous odds. The NCIS
maintained both a field investigation and an oversight committee in
Washington that kept tabs on the progress of the investigation. NCIS
officials acknowledged during the preliminary investigation that at least 65
special agents were occupied with the case at its zenith in the summer of
2006. The government has spent untold millions of dollars and thousands of
man hours without proving its case. Over time the so-called Haditha massacre
that never happened fell off the publicÃââs radar screen.
Closely monitoring the situation was former Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld, who formed a study group to determine what to do after the
late Pennsylvania Congressman John Murtha accused the Marines involved of
massacre and cover-up. He used the occasion to attack the war policies of
former President George W. Bush.
RumsfeldÃââs hastily assembled study groupÃââs analysis of the
political and legal situation was used to help decide what course of action
to take against eight Marines ultimately accused of massacre and cover up in
the deaths of the Iraqis.
The group was briefed by high ranking Marine Corps lawyers sent
by Brigadier General Kevin Sandkuhler, Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant
of the Marine Corps at the time. Also in the mix was Peter M. Murphy, former
General Counsel to the Marine Corps--a civilian who counseled Commandants and
their lawyers for 20 years. Both men have since retired. The odds makers said
the Haditha Eight didnÃâât stand a chance.
Puckett wouldnÃâât say
precisely how he plans to prevail, although he offered a few hints. For one
thing heÃââs gathered a Dream Team of experienced military trial attorneys
and military law experts. His team includes two retired Marine lawyers, an
international law expert, and an active duty major appointed to the
proceedings.
Among them is Colby Vokey,
another retired Marine lieutenant colonel that was so effective representing
Wuterich and the other defendants during the preliminary hearings in 2007 he
was fired until the uproar from prominent military jurists forced the Marine
Corps to reinstate him.
Also on the team is retired
Major Haytham Faraj, PuckettÃââs partner and a dogged interrogator. Faraj
served 22 years in the Corps before retiring as the senior military defense
counsel at Camp Pendleton, CA.
Also on board is Mark S. Zaid,
an international law expert who usually takes on government intelligence
agencies for a living. All three lawyers were familiar names and faces when
the international press descended on Camp Pendleton after the hearings began
in May, 2007.
The latest addition to the
team is Major Meredith Marshall, the senior defense attorney at Miramar Naval
Air Station. She was appointed by the Marine Corps as military counsel for
Wuterich. She is the only newcomer in the mix and the only female lawyer to
participate in the case.
Arrayed against them is the
prosecution team led by Lieutenant Colonel Sean Sullivan, a former reservist
who decided to remain in the Corps and give up his civilian practice in
Chicago. He has the resources of the entire prosecutorial apparatus of the
Department of Defense at his disposal. Sullivan and his stable of prosecutors
have tangled with Puckett before. There is no love lost.
Wuterich didn't kill anyone
At stake is a lot more than
the guilt or innocence of Wuterich. Puckett plans to put the proceedings on trial
as well. Seven times the government has brought Marines who fought at Haditha
before the bar and seven times they have been set free (the eighth had
charges dropped against him). That by itself says something, he noted.
ÃâÅThe mindset of those guys was
no being policemen. Cops go through scenarios about shoot or not shoot during
a hostage rescue. This was not a hostage rescue. They had received fire from
those houses and that made them hostile and a hostile house is a target. They
could have called an airstrike on House #1. That has always been an integral
part of our case,Ãâ Puckett said.
The forensic evidence gathered at the crime
scene months after the engagement will show that Wuterich did not kill
anyone, Puckett added.
ÃâÅIn a murder investigation the deceased
usually has one or more bullet holes in them. The cops like to match the
bullets that made them to a handgun and the gun to the suspect. It is the
same thing here. When you charge a Marine with shooting someone Ãââ murder -
you want to be able to say who did it; the weapon with this serial number was
issued to this Marine who was there on a certain day. There are no bullets or
other forensic evidence that shows Wuterich shot anyone,Ãâ Puckett said.
Another issue is the onus of command influence
that is yet to be resolved, Puckett said
On March 23, 2010 Wuterich won a key ruling that still could lead to the
dropping of the case. Lieutenant Colonel David Jones, a military judge who
heard the motion to dismiss the charges against Wuterich ruled his lawyers
had successfully shown that there was the evidence of the same undue command
influence that set his commanding officer free. Even so Jones ruled against a motion to dismiss the case during a hearing
at Camp Pendleton and ordered Wuterich to stand trial.
During the two-day hearing
General Mattis and retired Lieutenant General Samuel Helland, who supported
MattisÃââ decisions when he took over command form the distinguished officer
was promoted testified the government was not improperly influenced. Faraj
said it was to the Marine Corps' credit that Mattis was ordered to undergo
cross-examination about the case. It is unusual for a four-star general to be
called to the witness stand.
A military judge dismissed
charges of dereliction of duty and orders violations against Lieutenant
Colonel Jeffrey Chessani in June 2008 after finding that undue command
influence had sullied his case. Chessani the highest ranking and last officer
to be accused of criminal behavior retired in July. The father of seven was
the battalion commander of 3/1 before being relieved for cause in late March
2006. Twice the government unsuccessfully appealed the ruling and
ordered him before a non-judicial Board of Inquiry before it finally called
off its relentless pursuit.
ÃâÅUnlawful command
influence is the mortal enemy of military justice,Ãâ said military judge
Colonel Steven Folsom at the time. ÃâÅIn order to restore the public
confidence, we need to take it back. We need to turn the clock back.ÃâÂ
Folsom determined General
James N. Mattis had tainted the proceedings when he was the convening
authority who sent Chessani and the other defendants to court-martial.
The charges against two other
3/1 officers were dismissed during preliminary hearings when the government
could not produce enough evidence to make their case. Lieutenant Andrew
Grayson, an intelligence officer and the only Marine to go to court martial,
was found not guilty of impeding the investigation and trying to sneak out of
the Marine Corps, perhaps the zaniest charge the case spawned.
At the time Puckett said his
client "is in good spirits. He hasn't complained at all. He loves the
Marine Corps and wants to make it a career."
Puckett said the court martial is scheduled to
last three weeks. The government has called 47 witnesses, including former
defendants, forensic investigators, and immunized 3/1 Marines who testified
in the past. Among the witnesses on the list is Jeffrey Chessani,
WuterichÃââs battalion commander who retired in July after being exonerated of
criminal charges.
__________________________________________
Nathaniel R.
Helms
Defend
Our Marines
14 August 2010
Note: Nat Helms is a Contributing Editor to Defend
Our Marines. He is a Vietnam
veteran, former police
officer, war correspondent, and, most recently, author of My Men Are My Heroes: The
Brad Kasal Story (Meredith
Books, 2007).
|