N, please edit and send to Debra. Debra, Mr. Misuraca (Misuraca v. Dept of Transportation) has Emailed a response to the billing we sent on Friday Dec 23, 2011. He indicated he was being doubled billed for work and that he informed you. I assume he is requesting you to review the billing. Please see the invoices he sent on Friday in response to the December 14th Billing when comparing to the attached TM print out of the legal services provided to him throughout 2011. There are three line items that were not billed. One looks as if it was identified on a TM invoice but never sent to him. 12/14/2011 - Review Final Opposition to SJ ATTNY: DAD, .5 do not bill 9/12/2011 - ROI Review; ATTNY: TAM, 1.0 do not bill 8/18/2011 - Telecon w/Agency Rep RE: Discovery; Attny: DAD; .1 DAD - billed on TM invoice 315 but never sent to client. $22.50 The four line items ( indicated with the **) never billed to Mr. Misuraca are included in the Dec 14th (TM 388) invoice: 12/14/11 - Review and Revise TM's Draft Opposition to SJ; Attny: DAD, .7 = $157.50 12/13/11 - Email with Client Re: Billing Issues; Attny: DAD, .2 = $45.00 10/20/11 - Initial Client Meeting and Deposition Prep; Attny TAM, 2 hrs = $450.00 9/12/11 - Review/Edit Discovery Responses; Attny: TAM, 3 hrs = $675.00 ONE OVERCHARGE IS NOTED: 8/30/11 - Preparing Interrogatories & Request for Admissions; Para: BT, 3 hrs at $50 = $150.00 (You charged him $300 on TM 333) All other entries on the TM summary are on a QB and associated TM invoices. NOTE: Item 11/30/2010 is not in the calculations for the amount due. If you agree with this summary, we will redo the most recent billing to show a credit for the overcharge on TM 333, Bethany's time incorrectly charged, of $150.00. All else appears to be accurate from the TM record.
Attachment:
MisuracaTM-Billing.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document