RE: Draft Wuterich reply

[dhsullivan@aol.com]

How can I possibly be so bad with middle initials?  Okay, from now on, 
everyone has just first and last names.  :-)

Here's the current version of the brief with Maj Sip's changes accepted 
and a few additional typos cleaned up.

Neal & Haytham, thoughts?  I should be able to do the index and table 
of authorities over lunch.  Maj Sip, is Code 40 doing a CAAF run today? 
If so, what's the deadline?  (If we miss it, I can always e-file it.)

Semper Fi,
DHS (or, I guess, just DS)

-----Original Message-----
From: Sripinyo, Kirk Major NAMARA, CODE 45 <kirk.sripinyo@navy.mil>
To: DHSULLIVAN@aol.com; neal@puckettfaraj.com; haytham@puckettfaraj.com
Sent: Mon, Nov 22, 2010 8:06 am
Subject: RE: Draft Wuterich reply

Gents-

 Looks good.  Very minor edits and suggestions attached.

v/r
Sip

-----Original Message-----
From: DHSULLIVAN@aol.com [mailto:DHSULLIVAN@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 3:11
To: neal@puckettfaraj.com; haytham@puckettfaraj.com; Sripinyo, Kirk 
Major NAMARA, CODE 45
Subject: Draft Wuterich reply

Well that took longer than I expected -- but only because Code 46's 
brief was so bad, it took quite some time to point out all of the 
problems.

This is due on Monday; it's nowhere near perfect and I'm going to be 
useless as an editor at 0300.  So let's swap it around tomorrow and 
then get it filed.  We'll also need an index and table of authorities, 
but that should be pretty easy--I can pretty much cut and paste from 
the one we used for the underlying writ appeal petition.

I got really mad rereading the government's brief.  How dare they say 
we conceded all of those things when we never did?

Semper Fi,
DHS

Attachment: Wuterich_writ_appeal_reply_(Sullivan)_Sripinyo_Edits[1].doc
Description: Binary data