[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Draft Wuterich reply



Gents-

  Looks good.  Very minor edits and suggestions attached.

v/r
Sip 

-----Original Message-----
From: DHSULLIVAN@aol.com [mailto:DHSULLIVAN@aol.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 3:11
To: neal@puckettfaraj.com; haytham@puckettfaraj.com; Sripinyo, Kirk Major NAMARA, CODE 45
Subject: Draft Wuterich reply

Well that took longer than I expected -- but only because Code 46's brief was so bad, it took quite some time to point out all of the problems.
 
This is due on Monday; it's nowhere near perfect and I'm going to be useless as an editor at 0300.  So let's swap it around tomorrow and then get it filed.  We'll also need an index and table of authorities, but that should be pretty easy--I can pretty much cut and paste from the one we used for the underlying writ appeal petition.
 
I got really mad rereading the government's brief.  How dare they say we conceded all of those things when we never did?
 
Semper Fi,
DHS

Attachment: Wuterich writ appeal reply (Sullivan) Sripinyo Edits.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature