[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BIlling for Tommy Burden



 I do not have a signed copy of the current contract with Burden.  It does not give a fee only a fee advance request; there is not a quote of $5500 or a cap.  You are confusing this case with Wilridge's 3d contract.  Draft FA at the bottom of this Email.

I would prefer you go flat fee for the rest of this or call it a day right now.  I cannot find all the data needed to do accurate billing.  

Here is the draft FA I have on this case dated 1 September 2008.  Do you have a copy with the Client signature?   Is this the current contract?  It is dated 2008. 
M

Marcelyn Atwood
Business Manager 

The Law Firm of Puckett & Faraj, PC
1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314 

703-706-9566 ; FAX 202-318-7652 ; marcy@puckettfaraj.com
Please View our Website:  www.puckettfaraj.com and follow us on Twitter:  http://twitter.com/puckettfaraj

The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

On Oct 4, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Haytham Faraj wrote:

Did they pay a full $5500?  I believe that was our agreement but that it would be hourly.  I prefer to stick with the original contract of hourly work.
 
Haytham Faraj, Esq.
PUCKETT & FARAJ, PC
_______________________
WASHINGTON DC METRO
1800 Diagonal Road
Suite 210
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-0442 Phone
 
DETROIT METRO
6200 Schaefer Road
Suite 202
Dearborn, MI 48126
313-457-1390 Phone
202-280-1039 Fax
 
 
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.
 
From: Marcy [mailto:marcy@puckettfaraj.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 1:42 PM
To: Faraj Haytham
Cc: mariam Chamesseddine; Nicholson Kenneth
Subject: Re: BIlling for Tommy Burden
 
Correction:  Current Billing charges:
Current Charges total $740.54
7/29/10 - Post to SECNAV Board requesting Hearing - $5.54
7/30 - 8/2/10 - Attny time to coordinate hearing 1.3 hrs x 350 = $455.00
9/9/10 - Attny time Hearing Req't Form 0.3 x 350 = $$105
9/24/10 - Attny time Email Client/review case file 0.5 x 350 = $175.00
 
On Oct 4, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Marcy wrote:


H, Burden has no money in the account.  Recommend instead of billing the hours and expenses totaling $460.54 you call Mrs Burden and agree on a flat fee for the hearing on 29 November.  Please Advise.  
 
Current Charges
7/29/10 - Post to SECNAV Board requesting Hearing - $5.54
7/30 - 8/2/10 - Attny time to coordinate hearing 1.3 hrs x 350 = $455.00
 
OLD ACCOUNT INFORMATION: 
Audit shows the following: 
Retainer in 2008 - $2,500.00 // Legal Svcs in 2008 = $647.50 = $1852.50 Retainer moved to 2009
Legal Services in 2009
   3/25/09 - Inv #35 = $560.00
   6/1/09 - Inv #78 = $1160.00 
   6/22/09 - Inv #93 = $315.00
   8/24/09 - Inv #125 = $430.00
   Total = $2465 
Paid $558.50 on 9/12/09 
 
Audit on 5/5/10:  Paid $3058.50 and owed $3112.50  (off by $54 dollars - not showing in QB as a bill, must be a mistake in accounting)
 

Attachment: Burden Hourly fee agreement.doc
Description: MS-Word document