[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: US v. Saleh, Government Motion to Exclude (UNCLASSIFIED)

Subject: Re: US v. Saleh, Government Motion to Exclude (UNCLASSIFIED)
From: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:59:38 -0400
Cc: "Douglas, Laquisha S CPT MIL USA FORSCOM" <laquisha.douglas@us.army.mil>
In-reply-to: <AB6725F9BBC6394E85FF58E4F82C7BF00104FAB3@IRWI100BEEXCH02.nasw.ds.army.mil>
References: <AB6725F9BBC6394E85FF58E4F82C7BF00104FAB3@IRWI100BEEXCH02.nasw.ds.army.mil>

The government has the burden wrong, I think. They are the moving party to exclude which means it is on them by preponderance of the evidence. 

Haytham Faraj
Sent from my iPad

On Jun 13, 2011, at 5:46 PM, "Wright, Matthew E CPT MIL US USA FORSCOM" <matt.wright@us.army.mil> wrote:

> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: FOUO
> 
> COL Pohl,
> 
> Pursuant to the pre-trial order issued by COL Robertson, a motion to exclude
> certain evidence is attached.
> 
> Very Respectfully,
> CPT Wright
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: FOUO
> 
> 
> <Government Motion to Exclude.pdf>

Prev by Date: Governments motion to exclude immigration evidence
Next by Date: Sallaum lines
Previous by thread: Governments motion to exclude immigration evidence
Next by thread: Fwd: US v. Saleh, Government Motion to Exclude (UNCLASSIFIED)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread