I can’t do it Tuesday. I’ll be at the Ranch for the Death penalty Course. I can do it the following Monday or Tuesday, preferably Monday. From: Neal Puckett [mailto:napuckett@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 9:06 AM To: Faraj Haytham Subject: Fwd: Charlie Gittins sent you a message on Facebook... H, Just woke up. Got this from Charlie Gittins via FB. Can you do this 32 for him in Monterrey on Tues? Great opportunity. I had offered to assist him during his recovery from his back injury, but I'm in a GCM next week in FL. N 1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. Date: June 8, 2011 4:22:59 AM PDT Subject: Charlie Gittins sent you a message on Facebook...
| Neal: Do you or Hiatham have time for a 32 in Monterey on Tuesday? I don't want this kid to have to wait for weeks while I heal from my broken back. I have full fee $8500) and airfare in hand ($ 1880) which I'll send you for the 32 if one of you guys cn commit. It is a BS sex assault case and has maybe 3 witessesses beyond the prosecutrix and my client, SPC Olds. I want to take care of this kid abd while it is an easy 32 fee, justice is getting delayed for him. Let me know.
CG |
| Thanks, bro. Hoping for notice of appeal so I can skydive this weekend and clear my head. |
| Here's wishing you a win, in whatever form it comes. Your stamina is inspirational. |
| Well, it is not likely to end for a while -- Gov is about to take an Article 62 appeal with one witness left to go in Defense case-in-chief. After 9 weeks, we are going to send the members away for 4 months (minimum) while the 62 appeal and CAAF review proceed on a discretionary ruling that the MJ made to ameliorate a due process failure to disclose evidence on the part of the prosecution. They won't win, but at least I'll have a chance to rest -- 9 weeks and I have had 2 days off, so my frustration level was pretty high. I think my trial work will probably be cut back and I'll focus on records correction and appellate work. These kinds of trials are debilitating and the only reason it has taken so long is that the G is unprepared and does not know what they are doing. Very frustrating. McKinney was my second longest court-martial -- 6 weeks and 1 week of that was member deliberations on findings. This is ridiculous for a 2 spec murder case (on which we have a rationale basis to earn an acquittal based on the credible, emotional and uncontradicted testimony of our client) |
| Still thinking this is your last military trial case per your earlier missive? |
| Your question re: CWO-2 Riley: No. He has no civilian representation as of yesterday per my phonecon with Maj Meridith Marshall, the detailed counsel. I consulted, and so did Applegate, apparently. Meridith believes he's not hearing what he wants to hear AND he can't afford good help. |
|
| View Conversation on Facebook · Reply to this email to message Charlie Gittins. |
|
|