Re: Week of 15 Nov

[Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>]

You're correct about that your honor. I'll discuss it with the TC. 

Vr,

Haytham Faraj 
Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:59 AM, "Rubin LtCol Peter R" <peter.rubin@usmc.mil> wrote:

> Mr. Faraj,
> 
> I believe you are referring to the Vega case the week of 15 Nov.  Have you discussed the status of that case with the TC?  I know that the 1 Nov Vega motions hearing fell out due to Wuterich - those motions will have to be litigated prior to trial.  Do you believe the Vega case will still be going to trial the week of 15 Nov?  
> 
> Perhaps the Vega motions could be litigated the week of 15 Nov and the trial down the road.  I imagine that would free up two days the week of 15 Nov to litigate the Scarselli motion.  
> 
> R/
> LtCol Rubin 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 8:34 PM
> To: Rubin LtCol Peter R; Hur Capt Christian P
> Cc: Grisalesmery Cpl Alejandro; Gilinsky Capt David
> Subject: RE: US v. Scarselli: 3rd UCI motion by the Defense
> 
> Your honor,
> I am scheduled for a court-martial in this circuit the week of 15 November.
> The week of 22-24 November I have a Board hearing in Illinois. I will see
> Capt Hur tomorrow.  We'll come up with some recommendations on dates for
> you.
> 
> Vr,
> Haytham Faraj
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rubin LtCol Peter R [mailto:peter.rubin@usmc.mil] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 5:20 PM
> To: Hur Capt Christian P; Haytham Faraj
> Cc: Grisalesmery Cpl Alejandro; Gilinsky Capt David
> Subject: RE: US v. Scarselli: 3rd UCI motion by the Defense
> 
> All,
> 
> Looking at the long-range docket I see that there are a couple of 29 Palms
> cases going the week of 15 Nov (Alston GP on 16 Nov and the contested
> Mattison SPCM 17-19 Nov).  This may present a courtroom availability issue
> and require the Scarselli motion to be litigated at Camp Pen if the motion
> is going to be litigated the week of 15 Nov.  
> 
> Does the 22-24 Nov timeframe work better for you?  I am flexible.  
> 
> R/
> LtCol Rubin
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hur Capt Christian P 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:14 PM
> To: Rubin LtCol Peter R; 'Haytham Faraj'
> Cc: Grisalesmery Cpl Alejandro; Gilinsky Capt David
> Subject: RE: US v. Scarselli: 3rd UCI motion by the Defense
> 
> Sir,
> 
> I have a 39a on 15 November in US v. Egnash.  I'm clear 16 and 17 November.
> 18 and 19 November, the Chief Defense Counsel of the Marine Corps has asked
> that all MCRD DCs be available to meet with him.  
> 
> Christian P. Hur
> Captain, USMC
> Senior Defense Counsel
> Telephone:  (619) 524-8713
> Fax:  (619) 524-6784
> Address:  Defense Section, Bldg 12, 1st Floor, MCRD, San Diego, CA 92140
> 
> This email may contain Attorney Work Product.  Please delete if you received
> this message in error.
>   
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rubin LtCol Peter R 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 14:12
> To: Hur Capt Christian P; 'Haytham Faraj'
> Cc: Grisalesmery Cpl Alejandro; Gilinsky Capt David
> Subject: RE: US v. Scarselli: 3rd UCI motion by the Defense
> 
> Capt Hur / Mr. Faraj,
> 
> I would like to litigate the motion during the week of 15 November.  I
> recommend that we set aside 2 days to be on the safe side.  What is your
> availability that week?
> 
> R/
> LtCol Rubin
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gilinsky Capt David 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 2:10 PM
> To: Rubin LtCol Peter R
> Cc: 'Haytham Faraj'; Grisalesmery Cpl Alejandro; Hur Capt Christian P
> Subject: RE: US v. Scarselli: 3rd UCI motion by the Defense
> 
> Sir,
> 
> It appears that the government will need at least a week to look into the
> latest four allegations of UCI and respond.  The defense has further
> requested the production of witnesses who are scattered between Okinawa and
> Kentucky and did not provide any contact information for these individuals.
> It will likely take the rest of the week to determine their availability,
> especially considering that two if not three of the individuals are
> civilians who were fired for misconduct, and may not have either local
> addresses or have left forwarding information.  It should be possible to
> have responses to the court by 10 Nov. 2010.
> 
> V/R
> 
> Capt Gilinsky
> 
> 
> 
>