[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Alternate Testimony

To: Gilinsky Capt David <david.gilinsky@usmc.mil>
Subject: Re: Alternate Testimony
From: Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 12:51:41 -0700
Cc: Hur Capt Christian P <christian.hur@usmc.mil>
In-reply-to: <319A1581C102B4489BBAD3E599D6006E02150296@mcuspndlez05v.mcdsus.mcds.usmc.mil>
References: <74509E61E4DB6E40BBDE809E4CE7307A0177676A@mcuspndlez03v.mcdsus.mcds.usmc.mil> <319A1581C102B4489BBAD3E599D6006E02150296@mcuspndlez05v.mcdsus.mcds.usmc.mil>

Sgt Maj Wrench and Col Anderson may be telephonic. We will not agree to telephonic testimony to government witnesses. 

Haytham Faraj 
Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 3, 2010, at 10:12 AM, "Gilinsky Capt David" <david.gilinsky@usmc.mil> wrote:

> Gentlemen,
> 
> The following witnesses have expressed concerns over their availability:
> 
> Richard A. Anderson, Col. (Necessity- Afghanistan)
> 
> Herbert Wrench, SgtMaj. (Follicular Lymphoma)
> 
> Roy C. Buchanan, GySgt  (Attending Staff Academy)
> 
> Additionally, I believe that Col. Quoss has contacted you regarding the same.  Would you be amenable to alternate forms of testimony to include stipulations of expected testimony or telephonic testimony?  Thank you.
> 
> V/R
> 
> Capt Gilinsky
> 
>

Prev by Date: Re: Week of 15 Nov
Next by Date: Congratulations Congressman
Previous by thread: FW: PO WOFFORD
Next by thread: RE: Col Quoss
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread