Re: Witness Production Conversation of 20100827 (U.S. v. SSgt Wuterich)

[Haytham <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>]

Laughner, doesn't give us anything except the possibility of 7.62 rounds on the floor that aren't from an m240G. Did the back bedroom of house #2 have a direct line of fire to any friendly troop locations that morning?

Haytham Faraj 
760-521-7934
Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 27, 2010, at 5:04 PM, "Colby Vokey" <cvokey@fhsulaw.com> wrote:

> Are we sure we want to lose Laughner?  Isn't he the only one who will testify that there were other than 5.56 rounds at the doorway of house 2?
> Not sure about Doc Whitt either. 
> Colby
> ------Original Message------
> From: Brower Capt Matthew R
> To: Haytham Faraj
> To: Neal Puckett
> To: cvokey@fhsulaw.com
> To: Major Meredith Marshall
> Cc: Gannon Maj Nicholas L
> Cc: Sullivan LtCol Sean
> Sent: Aug 27, 2010 16:41
> Subject: Witness Production Conversation of 20100827 (U.S. v. SSgt Wuterich)
> 
> Gentlemen, and Ma'am,
>     This e-mail is being sent to memorialize that Mr. Haytham and Major Gannon in the presence of Mr. Vokey and myself had a conversation about the following witnesses whom Mr. Haytham stated the defense would no longer be requesting at the trial in this case:
> 
> -Rene Rodriguez
> 
> -Brian D. Whitt
> 
> -Martha Ann Noonan
> 
> -Jerrett Bilski
> 
> -Major Dana Haytt
> 
> -MSgt Dunlap
> 
> -SSgt Laughner
> 
> -LCol Jeffrey Chessani
> 
> -Neller
> 
> Please let me know if any of this information is incorrect or if there was a misunderstanding on anyone's part about the defense no longer requesting these witnesses.  Thanks.
> 
> Very Respectfully,
> 
> Matthew Brower
> Captain, USMC
> 
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T