[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Witness Production Conversation of 20100827 (U.S. v. SSgt Wuterich)



That is what laughner said about the rounds. I'll email them and tell them we want laughner. 

Haytham Faraj 
760-521-7934
Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 28, 2010, at 6:07 PM, "Colby Vokey" <cvokey@fhsulaw.com> wrote:

> I'd have to look at the pictures again to see if they could have fired at
> the roadside from that window. The window of that bldge was oriented
> correctly, just don't know if could see any part of the convoy. If I recall
> Laughners testimony, he said that they were not 5.56 but were larger and
> could have been 7.62.  Doesn't matter where they came from.  Just that they
> came from a weapon other than our team clearing the house.  I don't think we
> get that opinion or evidence from any other source.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haytham [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 9:29 AM
> To: cvokey@fhsulaw.com
> Cc: Neal Puckett
> Subject: Re: Witness Production Conversation of 20100827 (U.S. v. SSgt
> Wuterich)
> 
> Laughner, doesn't give us anything except the possibility of 7.62 rounds on
> the floor that aren't from an m240G. Did the back bedroom of house #2 have a
> direct line of fire to any friendly troop locations that morning?
> 
> Haytham Faraj 
> 760-521-7934
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Aug 27, 2010, at 5:04 PM, "Colby Vokey" <cvokey@fhsulaw.com> wrote:
> 
>> Are we sure we want to lose Laughner?  Isn't he the only one who will
> testify that there were other than 5.56 rounds at the doorway of house 2?
>> Not sure about Doc Whitt either. 
>> Colby
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: Brower Capt Matthew R
>> To: Haytham Faraj
>> To: Neal Puckett
>> To: cvokey@fhsulaw.com
>> To: Major Meredith Marshall
>> Cc: Gannon Maj Nicholas L
>> Cc: Sullivan LtCol Sean
>> Sent: Aug 27, 2010 16:41
>> Subject: Witness Production Conversation of 20100827 (U.S. v. SSgt
> Wuterich)
>> 
>> Gentlemen, and Ma'am,
>>    This e-mail is being sent to memorialize that Mr. Haytham and Major
> Gannon in the presence of Mr. Vokey and myself had a conversation about the
> following witnesses whom Mr. Haytham stated the defense would no longer be
> requesting at the trial in this case:
>> 
>> -Rene Rodriguez
>> 
>> -Brian D. Whitt
>> 
>> -Martha Ann Noonan
>> 
>> -Jerrett Bilski
>> 
>> -Major Dana Haytt
>> 
>> -MSgt Dunlap
>> 
>> -SSgt Laughner
>> 
>> -LCol Jeffrey Chessani
>> 
>> -Neller
>> 
>> Please let me know if any of this information is incorrect or if there was
> a misunderstanding on anyone's part about the defense no longer requesting
> these witnesses.  Thanks.
>> 
>> Very Respectfully,
>> 
>> Matthew Brower
>> Captain, USMC
>> 
>> 
>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>