Joe Lisi’s letter is excellent. I hope I’ll have an opportunity to meet him one day. He is a great friend to you. Don’t’ worry about any of this derailing the NJP. The only way it can be derailed is through you and frankly I don’t care if it does. As I told you before. They may not accept it anyway because they don’t want to hear the truth. That said, I think an NJP is a good hedge. From: Pietro Scarselli [mailto:scarselli13@yahoo.com] Gentlemen, attached is the letter Joe LISI composed on my behalf. I ask you to review it b/c I am now always concerned about any specifics of the charges that may be included in any letter presented to the CG...that it does not compromise its credibility (giving an impression that I influenced the respective author(s) with my version of the events/facts, etc)...and that it does not have a reverse affect on the SJA/CG, like you have both described to me (WRT my own personal statement, which I near done revising accordingly). If I understood both of you correctly WRT the KNOBEL letter, it good to go, (with the two sentences deleted)...in other words, unlikely to drive the CG to resend it to a GCM (b/c it does not weaken the guilty pleas, etc)...correct? BECK and HUMBERTSON's letter are written in the same light/manner as KNOBELs...so I'd like to send them to you later when I get them to double check you are both comfortable with them and their potential affect (or not) on the CG (and SJA). As always I appreciate y'alls time and advise/assitance. S/F! Pietro R/ ----- Forwarded Message ---- -----Original Message----- Joe you can forward this as is now. Love JPOD IRS Circular 230 |