[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: U.S. v. Sezginalp



Neal:

While I've barely had a chance to talk to the CA (he's been on the road), I don't think he's overly exercised about this case.  I'd like to think I could obtain support for a SILT.

Hope you are enjoying the snow.

s/f Woody   

-----Original Message-----
From: Neal Puckett [mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 4:20
To: Woodworth Col John R
Subject: U.S. v. Sezginalp

Woody,
Got your correspondence just now.  So what's the plan for Sezginalp, assuming his conviction is reversed?  Are we going to retry him or separate him?
S/f,
Neal

Neal A. Puckett, Esq
LtCol, USMC (Ret)
Puckett & Faraj, PC
Washington DC | Virginia
888.970.0005
www.puckettfaraj.com 


The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender.  You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature