Laura, With the knowledge that San and his folks want him to get VA treatment, what do you think about this flippant reply from the SJA? If by SILT he means an OTH, I think we may want to call his bluff and retry the case together. Thoughts? Neal Neal A. Puckett LtCol, USMC (Ret) Puckett & Faraj, PC
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
Neal:While I've barely had a chance to talk to the CA (he's been on the road), I don't think he's overly exercised about this case. I'd like to think I could obtain support for a SILT.Hope you are enjoying the snow.s/f Woody -----Original Message-----From: Neal Puckett [mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com] Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2010 4:20To: Woodworth Col John RSubject: U.S. v. SezginalpWoody,Got your correspondence just now. So what's the plan for Sezginalp, assuming his conviction is reversed? Are we going to retry him or separate him?S/f,NealNeal A. Puckett, EsqLtCol, USMC (Ret)Puckett & Faraj, PCWashington DC | Virginia888.970.0005www.puckettfaraj.com The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 888-970-0005 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution.
|