If you are unable to see the message below, click here to view.
AAJ News Brief for Haytham Faraj | Thursday, April 8, 2010 |
|
|
Leading the News
Toyota emails show executive had urged company to "come clean."
The CBS Evening News (4/7, story 7, 0:25, Rodriguez) reported that
according to internal Toyota emails, "company executives wrestled with how to
deal with sticking accelerator pedals. In January, five days before announcing
a massive recall, an American vice president wrote 'we are not protecting our
customers by keeping this quiet,' and 'the time has come to not hide on this
one.' Toyota had no comment
today."
NBC Nightly News (4/7, story 4, 0:40, Williams) reported on one such
email, "written by a company executive here in the US just five days before
Toyota announced a massive recall. In the e-mail, the company executive
acknowledges the company has accelerator pedal problems. Goes on to say, 'we
are not protecting our consumers by keeping this quiet. The time to hide on
this one is over. We need to come
clean.'"
Bloomberg
News (4/8, Keane, Ohnsman) reports that despite calls from within the
company for "a more cautious approach," the email from Toyota US VP Irv Miller
urged the company "to 'come clean'...about mechanical failures in accelerator
pedals for some vehicles." Miller "told other officials in an e-mail on Jan. 16
that 'the time to hide on this one is over.'" Noting that Secretary LaHood said
this week that Toyota waited some four months to relate its findings about
unintended acceleration to the public, Bloomberg adds that "Miller, who retired
from Toyota later in January, declined to comment." Nor would Toyota comment
directly on Miller's
email.
The Los
Angeles Times (4/8, Vartabedian, Bensinger) reports that Miller's email
came in response to an executives' suggestion that his "colleagues to keep quiet
about defective accelerator pedals. ... The exchange -- which occurred just
days before a massive recall of Toyota vehicles to repair accelerator pedals --
is the clearest indication so far that Toyota was debating internally when to
disclose to its customers and federal safety regulators mechanical problems that
were being linked to motorist complaints about sudden
acceleration."
Identifying the author of the email urging reticence as Katsuhiko Konagei, a
Toyota communications coordinator, the New
York Times (4/8, Maynard) reports that the exchange, made some three
days before Toyota execs met with NHTSA officials about a potential recall, "was
among 70,000 pages of documents requested from the company by the Transportation
Department and Congressional committees, which are investigating Toyota's
recalls." The Times notes that on Monday, LaHood "said he would seek the maximum
$16.4 million fine permitted against Toyota over the sticking pedal
recalls."
Toyota told European distributors about sticky gas pedals weeks before informing
NHTSA.
The AP
(4/8, Thomas, Margasak) reports that the documents reveal that "long before
Toyota told US regulators about sticking accelerator pedals, [it] warned its
distributors throughout Europe about similar problems." US complaints "were
rising at the end of 2009. The documents show that weeks earlier, on Sept. 29,
its European division issued technical information 'identifying a production
improvement and repair procedure to address complaints by customers in those
countries of sticking accelerator pedals, sudden rpm increase and/or sudden
vehicle acceleration.'" The AP notes that "LaHood cited the warnings to the
other countries" in announcing the decision to levy the record $16.4 million
fine against
Toyota.
From the American Association for
Justice |
AAJ's teleseminar on Toyota's
recalls, Protecting the Public: What You Need to Know About Toyota
Recalls, April 13, will help you figure out what exactly went wrong and what
you can do to help your clients. The faculty will cover the defects, how to
prove what happened with black box data, and next steps in prosecuting your
client's case. There will also be time for questions and answers with
AAJ's experienced faculty. To view the agenda and register, visit Continuing Legal Education. The AAJ Exchange
recently updated the Litigating the First Party Bad Faith Insurance Claim
Litigation Packet. The packet includes deposition transcripts and
summaries from claim adjusters and supervisors, a medical director, a corporate
designee, and defense experts as well as sample complaints, motions to compel,
interrogatories, and requests for production. The packet also addresses
issues related to ERISA, the genuine-issue rule, damages, and common
defenses. To order or view the table of contents for this or the more than
130 other Litigation Packets, visit the AAJ
Exchange or call 1-800-344-3023. The Insurance Law Section
focuses on legal remedies for those involved in any controversy between
insurance policy holders and their automobile, homeowners, health/medical, life,
and consumer insurers. In addition, the Section offers a list server, quarterly
newsletter, networking, referral opportunities, and much more. To learn about
our 18 Sections and join, visit Sections. |
|
|
Civil Justice System
Lead plaintiff in Indian trust suit doubts Congress will approve settlement by deadline.
The National
Law Journal (4/8, Scarcella) reports, "As the latest deadline for
congressional authorization of a $1.41 billion settlement in a long-running
Indian trust suit approaches next week," lead plaintiff Elouise Cobell said in
an open letter that "she's 'increasingly skeptical' that Congress will approve
the deal." The authorization deadline for the suit, which "seeks a historical
accounting of billions of dollars in natural resource royalties controlled by
the US Department of the Interior," is April 16. Lawyers "for the opposing
sides are meeting Thursday in the chambers of US District Judge James
Robertson," where "one issue that might be on the agenda is a request from the
Interior Department for court permission to speak directly to class members
about the
settlement."
Many 9/11 rescue workers experience large drops in lung function.
The New York
Times (4/8, A23, Grady) reports that "rescue workers exposed to thick
clouds of dust after the attack on the World Trade Center had large drops in
lung function lasting at least seven years," according to a study
published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Investigators looked at data
on "91.6 percent of the nearly 14,000 firefighters and Emergency Medical Service
staff members who worked at ground zero in the first two weeks after the
attack."
Bloomberg
News (4/8, Ostrow) reports that "in the first year after the 2001
attack, the lung exhale volume for firefighters who had never smoked declined
439 milliliters and dropped 267 milliliters for emergency medical workers who
never smoked, the study said." Altogether, approximately "13 percent of
firefighters and 22 percent of emergency medical workers had chronic bronchitis,
asthma, and lung ailments in 2008 that were caused by the dust and debris they
inhaled while working at Ground
Zero."
According to the AP
(4/8, Caruso), the research "dims hopes that workers who developed respiratory
problems after being exposed to the trade center's powdery and smoking remnants
would gradually return to
normal."
Seventh Circuit reduces damage award, but upholds finding that Illinois police framed father for murder.
The Chicago
Tribune (4/7, Schmadeke) reported, "An appeals court Wednesday agreed
with a federal jury's 2007 finding that Will County [IL] police framed Kevin Fox
for the rape and murder of his 3-year-old daughter Riley, but reduced the
damages awarded to Fox and his wife from $12.2 million to $8 million. The 7th
Circuit Court of Appeals chastised the investigators on the case, implying that
their decision to quickly rule out Riley's 2004 death as the work of a sexual
predator was 'absurd.'" DNA testing "by a private lab later ruled out Fox as a
suspect, and he was released in 2005 after eight months behind
bars."
Class-action suits against homebuilders dismissed.
The AP
(4/7) reported, "Homebuilder PulteGroup Inc. said Wednesday that a class-action
suit that accused it of contributing to the subprime mortgage meltdown has been
dismissed. The US District Court for the Central District of California also
dismissed the class-action suits that the plaintiffs' law firm, McCuneWright
LLP, had filed against seven other homebuilders, PulteGroup added." The suits
had alleged that "the home builders sold houses using high-risk loans by
"pressuring and enticing buyers" to use their own mortgage companies and
appraisers."
Tyson Foods to appeal chicken farmers' $7.3M award.
The AP
(4/7) reported, "Tyson Foods will appeal a $7.3 million verdict in a lawsuit
filed by the company's contract growers who claim the company defrauded them.
Tyson called the jury decision a 'runaway verdict,' and said the company abided
by the terms of its contracts with farmers. A group of McCurtain County farmers
sued Tyson, claiming the company coerced them into investing money into their
poultry houses and taking low payments for their
chickens."
Insurance
Two Massachusetts insurers to resume making new policies available using last year's rates.
In a front-page story, the Boston
Globe (4/8, A1, Weisman) reports, "Seeking to tone down their dispute
with state regulators, two Massachusetts health insurers yesterday said they
will, as ordered, resume making new policies available for individuals and small
businesses -- using last year's base rates, not the requested double-digit
increases rejected by the state last week." However, "the insurance companies,"
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts and Tufts Health Plan, "said they
could not guarantee that the new prices, which usually take weeks to calculate,
will be ready tomorrow, as the state
demanded."
BGlobe says judge should let insurance-rate rejections stand.
The Boston
Globe (4/8) editorializes, "After health-insurance companies covering
individuals and small businesses demanded rate hikes of up to 32 percent earlier
this year, the state stepped in and rejected the great majority of them." Now,
several "big insurers are going to court to block the state action." The Globe
argues that "the judge should let the rejections stand -- and the state's action
could finally compel all involved in the unsustainable inflation of health costs
to slow it
down."
|
|
Drug Safety
Eli Lilly settles Zyprexa suit with Louisiana.
The AP
(4/8, Sayre) reports, "Louisiana will receive $20 million in a settlement with
pharmaceutical maker Eli Lilly and Co. over its marketing of the anti-psychotic
drug Zyprexa [olanzapine], the state attorney general said Wednesday." Notably,
"Louisiana was one of 13 states that filed individual suits in state courts over
allegations that Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly pushed the drug for uses that had
not been approved by federal regulators." To date, "Louisiana is the 11th state
to settle." The AP points out that "Eli Lilly paid a $1.4 billion settlement to
the federal government in January 2009 after admitting it had promoted Zyprexa
for treatment of dementia in the
elderly."
FDA warns Biogen over Tysabri promotional materials.
Dow
Jones Newswire (4/8, Corbett Dooren) reports that the FDA on Wednesday
said a promotional webcast on the multiple sclerosis drug Tysabri (natalizumab)
is "false or misleading" because it minimizes the risk of a serious brain
infection. In a letter, the FDA also cited Biogen Idec Corp. for failing to
submit the webcast for review 30 days before using
it.
Reuters
(4/8, Heavey) also notes that the FDA warned Gilead Sciences for a
direct-to-consumer print advertisement for its HIV drug Truvada (emtiricitabine
and tenofovir). The Wall
Street Journal (4/7, White) "Health Blog" also covered the
story.
Employment/Workplace Safety
NFL players' decisions to accept settlements in California workers' comp cases examined.
The New
York Times (4/8, B13, Schwarz) reports that former NFL players and
current workers' compensation lawyers Ron Mix and Mel Owens "have leveraged
their connections to represent about 1,000 retired players in the workers'
compensation system of California." The California workers' compensation system
"emerged from the shadows on Monday when Eleanor Perfetto, the wife of Ralph
Wenzel, a 67-year-old former player with early-onset dementia, filed a claim
that is a test case in considering National Football League teams' liability for
the cognitive decline experienced by retired players." Many retired players
"consider Owens and Mix heroes among their own for essentially finding cash
under a mattress; others see an assembly-line process in which players do not
fully understand the implications of the settlements." The article questions
the wisdom of foregoing "the award of lifetime medical care for legitimate
injuries" in favor of a
settlement.
Eleventh Circuit hears former NFL players' suit over Ponzi scheme.
The Fulton County
Daily Report (4/8, Smith) reports, "Federal appeals court judges on
Tuesday grilled a lawyer trying to revive a suit brought by retired professional
football players against the National Football League and the NFL Players
Association. The ex-players asked a panel of the 11th US Circuit Court of
Appeals to reverse last year's ruling by Judge Julie E. Carnes dismissing their
suit claiming that the league and the union should be liable for a Ponzi scheme
perpetrated by a union-approved broker. Representing the ex-players, Fidelma L.
Fitzpatrick of South Carolina-based Motley Rice argued that Carnes' ruling
deprived her clients of a legal
remedy."
New Jersey lawyer found liable as employer in discrimination suit.
The New
Jersey Law Journal (4/8, Gottlieb) reports, "A New Jersey
debt-collection agency and its in-house lawyer have been hit with a $695,000
race-bias verdict in favor of an employee the lawyer didn't even know. A federal
court jury in Trenton found that Laurence Hecker of Toms River and APM Financial
Services, the debt-collection servicing company he represented, were dual
employers and therefore jointly liable for discriminating against a black
employee, Steven Bess." Although "there was no evidence Hecker had a role in
any workplace bias," the plaintiff "presented evidence that Hecker bore
responsibility as an employer because he was deeply entwined in the operation of
the agency, which presented itself to the public as 'The Law Office of Laurence
Hecker.'"
OSHA fines NJ Transit $569K for retaliation against railroad whistleblower.
The New
Jersey Law Journal (4/8, Toutant) reports, "The federal government on
Tuesday imposed a $569,000 penalty on NJ Transit for its retaliation against an
employee who reported a work-related injury, finding a 'reckless disregard for
the law and complete indifference for complainant's rights.' The penalty is the
largest the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has assessed under the
three-year-old Federal Rail Safety Act, which bars discrimination against
railroad whistleblowers. The OSHA ruling is also novel in that it compensates
conductor-flagman Anthony Araujo for financial problems - namely, loss of his
house and car and reduction in his credit score - caused by his suspension from
work."
Medical Errors/Healthcare
FDA issues warnings about fat-melting injections used in spas across the US.
The AP
(4/8, Perrone) reports that "the Food and Drug Administration is cracking
down on what are billed as fat-melting injections used in spas across
the US, saying the drugs" have not "been cleared by federal scientists, as
required by law." The agency asked a Brazilian company and six medical spas in
the US to provide a written response within 15 days with their action plan to
correct the situation, the Wall
Street Journal (4/8, Stynes)
reports.
The Philadelphia
Inquirer (4/8, Burling) explains, "In a procedure known variously as
lipodissolve, mesotherapy, lipozap, lipotherapy, or injection lipolysis,
patients receive a series of injections meant to 'dissolve and permanently
remove small pockets of fat from various parts of the body,' the FDA said. The
primary ingredients are phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate, although vitamins
and herbs may also be added." The agency "has not evaluated the drugs and says
it knows of no 'credible scientific evidence' that shows they eliminate
fat."
Nevertheless, CNN
(4/7, Willingham) "Paging Dr. Gupta" blog reported that "the companies have been
cited for a variety of regulatory violations, including making unsupported
claims that the products have an outstanding safety record and are superior to
other fat loss procedures, including
liposuction."
Complete Immunity Preemption
Blogger opposes Federal preemption of state finance regulations.
At the Huffington
Post (4/7), Stacy Mitchell of the New Rules Project's Community Banking
Initiative wrote, "At stake in the financial reform debate is an issue that has
received far less attention than the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, but
is at least as important: whether Congress will restore the authority of states
to oversee national banks." In the Senate, "big bank allies are hoping to cut a
deal in which they'd support other aspects of" Sen. Chris Dodd's financial
reform bill, "perhaps even the CFPA, in exchange for broad federal preemption of
state banking laws. We'd be fools to accept that
deal."
Administration says it will oppose weakening of Dodd bill.
The Washington
Post (4/8, Dennis, Cho, 684K) reports, "Obama administration officials
said Wednesday that they would fight efforts to weaken far-reaching Senate
legislation that would overhaul the nation's financial regulatory system."
Meanwhile, lawmakers "continue to negotiate a host of potential compromises" and
Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal Wolin said that the administration was "trying to
combat an 'enormous army of lobbyists' eager to reshape elements of the
legislation, particularly a provision that would establish a new consumer
protection agency." Among the matters being negotiated are the location of the
consumer protection agency and regulations for
derivatives.
Product Safety
Remediation company contends bacteria is causing Chinese drywall problems.
In a column in Florida's Treasure
Coast Palm (4/7), Anthony Westbury wrote that last week, Sabre
Environmental Services, "an international company doing Chinese drywall
remediation work in Vero Beach, reported it had found 'pervasive bacterial
contamination' in the wallboard that has been causing so much misery to so many
Floridians." The company recommended "a fumigation process it claims will rid
drywall of the bugs and the sulfur gases they emit for as little as $15 to $20 a
square foot." But a CPSC report issued two days later found no "bacteria in
drywall samples," and "concluded that affected homeowners should rip out all
tainted drywall along with electrical wiring, gas service piping and smoke and
carbon monoxide detection systems." Westbury comments that Sabre's method
"sounds at least plausible, and would be far cheaper than the government's
'we're-not-sure-what's-causing-it-but-we're-playing-it-safe-anyway'
method."
Attorneys say time running out to file Chinese drywall lawsuits.
The Biloxi
(MS) Sun Herald (4/7, Newsom) reported, "About 3,000 US homeowners,
including about 300 Mississippians, have joined class-action lawsuits against
Chinese-drywall manufacturers and await word about what relief they may receive,
as well as what steps they'll ultimately have to take to mitigate the effects of
the drywall. Attorneys also said time may be running out for those who haven't
joined class-action lawsuits." James R. Reeves Jr., "a Biloxi attorney with
Lumpkin & Reeves, is on a team of lawyers from New York, Louisiana, Florida and
North Carolina firms handling bellwether drywall cases in the New Orleans
trial." Said Reeves, "The most dangerous thing you can do is ignore this thing
or wait," adding, "If a case settlement comes down tomorrow, it will probably be
for those people who file those claims or have claims in the
process."
IG report identifies "significant weaknesses" in FDA's inspections of domestic food facilities.
In The
Hill (4/7) "Congress Blog," Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) pointed out that
"the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General
released a new report on the Food and Drug Administration's inspections of
domestic food facilities." The "report identifies significant
weaknesses...including the fact that FDA inspects less than a quarter of food
facilities each year, and that more than half of all food facilities have gone
five or more years without an FDA inspection," facts the senator calls
"unacceptable."
Those inadequacies are being attributed to declining staff numbers, according to
Reuters
(4/8, Melvin). Nevertheless, the IG report says that sporadic inspections
increase the likelihood of foodborne illness outbreaks. Late last year, the
Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee passed a food safety bill
that could receive approval once lawmakers return to Capitol Hill. Meanwhile,
the FDA is addressing the problems by revising its guidance on official action
indicated
classifications.
Also in the News
Donations, lobbying give mining industry "major political clout."
The Washington
Post (4/8, A19, Eggen) reports the mining industry, which came "under
renewed scrutiny this week after dozens of fatalities" at a Massey coal mine,
"wields major political clout in Washington thanks to hefty campaign
contributions to GOP lawmakers and expensive lobbying efforts aimed at blunting
the impact of environment- and safety-related legislation." An analysis by the
Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) found that "mining companies and related
trade groups have sharply increased their lobbying efforts in recent years,
tripling their spending from $10.2 million in 2004 to nearly $31 million in
2008." In addition, "mining firms and their employees have also donated more
than $13 million to federal lawmakers since 2005; 74 percent of that money went
to GOP candidates and about half came from industry political action
committees."
MSHA official: Mine explosions preventable.
The Washington
Post (4/8, O'Keefe) interviews Mike Davis, deputy assistant secretary
of operations for the US Mine Safety and Health Administration. Asked if MSHA
"did everything it could to avoid this explosion" at the Upper Big Branch coal
mine, Davis said, "As far as what recently happened, I really can't comment to
that, but MSHA's mission is to . . . do its part to ensure what happened doesn't
happen. Explosions are preventable. It is an obligation for that mine operator
to ensure that he provides a healthy and a safe workplace for his employees.
MSHA has oversight, but we don't have 24-7 onsite
time."
Partisan battle over Liu nomination "intensifying."
The Washington
Post (4/8, Pershing, 684K) reports, "A battle is intensifying in the
Senate over the appeals court nomination of Goodwin Liu, a law professor at the
University of California at Berkeley whom some Democrats consider a potential
nominee one day to the Supreme Court." The Post adds that "activists on both
the left and right view Liu's nomination as a practice run for the next Supreme
Court vacancy, which could come as soon as this year if Justice John Paul
Stevens
retires."
|
|
AAJ News Brief is a digest of the most important news selected from thousands of
sources by the editors of Custom Briefings. The presence of advertising does not
endorse, or imply endorsement of, any products or services by the American
Association for
Justice.
This complimentary copy of AAJ News Brief was sent to haytham@puckettfaraj.com as part of your
American Association for Justice membership. View Custom Briefings' privacy policy. Neither
Custom Briefings nor the American Association for Justice is liable for the use
of or reliance on any information contained in this
briefing.
For information about other member benefits, please contact American Association
for Justice Member Service Center at (800)
424-2727.
American Association for Justice | 777 6th Street, NW | Washington, DC 20001
Copyright © 2010 by Custom Briefings
|
11190 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 130 | Reston, VA 20191
|
|