[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RDO Street Lights



Mr. Faraj:

 

I am forwarding your thoughts on to Ms. Hamilton.  Thank you again for taking the time to write.

 

Sincerely,

 

Vickie Prosser, Aide to

Councilmember Jack Feller

 

From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 2:57 PM
To: Vickie Prosser
Cc: Rancho Del Oro- Mary Ann Redington
Subject: RE: RDO Street Lights

 

Ms. Prosser:

Thank you for your quick reply on behalf of Councilmember Feller.  I read the entire letter.  I want to point out some issues of concern.  The letter states that the street lights installed in Rancho Del Oro are different than those installed around the city.  That is certainly true but it is also true that the city was on notice and knew that the street lights in RDO are different.  The letter also states that the bases of the lights began to rust.  But you also admit that the maintenance was and remains that city’s responsibility.  Maintenance should not begin when the light poles need replacing.  The city should have undertaken to maintain the lights a long time ago.  The city’s negligence now requires it to have to expend more money on replacing the poles rather than a coat of paint applied once every couple of years to keep the rust off.  There are several more issues that are inconsistent and unpersuasive in the letter.  I will refrain from addressing them here until I hear the results of the meetings between the city and RDO.   I request, however,  that you inform the councilman that the city was on notice when it entered into the agreement.  The city managers knew that the lights were different; they knew that they were functional as well as atheistic; they knew that they would require more maintenance than the standard concrete lights the city uses.  And it also knew that a populated RDO subdivision would be a new tax revenue cash cow.  They, therefore,  willingly and knowingly entered into an agreement from which the benefitted but now seek to breach.  The city has taken my tax money.  I expect it to fulfill its obligations.

 

Vr,

Haytham Faraj

 

From: Vickie Prosser [mailto:VProsser@ci.oceanside.ca.us]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 5:35 PM
To: haytham@puckettfaraj.com
Subject: RDO Street Lights

 

Dear Mr. Faraj:

 

Councilmember Feller asked me to forward the following letter written by of our City Attorneys, Barbara Hamilton, regarding the issue with lights in your neighborhood.  He feels it answers many of the questions posed by individuals concerned with the situation and hope this will give you some idea as to the situation at this time.  Her letter stated:

 

In response to your specific questions and concerns: 

 

1.        As you know, the street lights in the RDO neighborhood are different from the street lights throughout the rest of the City.  This is so, because at the time the community was planned, the developer desired to establish a special aesthetic character unique to the RDO neighborhood, which was accomplished through the use of specialized improvements, facilities, signs and street furniture.  Those improvements and facilities, including the street lights, are not standard City items.  Pursuant to Street Maintenance Agreements with the City formed at the inception of the development, the City accepted responsibility for maintaining the street lights but only to the same extent as the City maintains City standard street lights.  Importantly, the RDO property owners (through their HOA) are responsible under the Street Maintenance Agreements to pay any extra cost to maintain the street lights “to the extent it exceeds the City’s cost of maintaining standard City items.” 

 

2.       The RDO street lights are constructed of a non-galvanized, painted metal; City standard street light poles, on the other hand, are made of concrete and require minimal maintenance.  The City has in fact maintained the RDO street lights at the same level as it has maintained City standard street lights in other areas of the City (e.g., replacing lamps and photo cells when necessary).  Under the Street Maintenance Agreements, the cost of providing any maintenance beyond that level is the responsibility of the property owners, through their HOA.  The HOA never requested the City to provide additional maintenance for the metal poles, even when City staff pointed out to the management company the first signs of rust on the poles.  Moreover, several years ago the City replaced many of the metal bases, which were beginning to rust, with plastic bases and did not recover the extra cost from the HOA, even though the City was entitled to do so under the Street Maintenance Agreements. The Street Maintenance Agreements specifically authorize the City to remove and replace non-standard improvements with City-standard improvements, at the HOA’s expense, “upon the City’s determination, in its sole discretion, that  the public health and safety require such permanent replacement.”  When the light poles became so rusted and deteriorated that they began to fall, the City determined that they posed a safety hazard and, after contacting the HOA’s management company, removed those poles that posed the greatest hazard.  The Street Maintenance Agreements specifically provide that the property owners, through the HOA, are responsible for the costs of removal and replacement of the street lights under these circumstances.

 

3.       The street light assessments that appear on your property tax bill are used to pay for electricity, maintenance, debt service, and administrative costs of providing street lighting throughout the City.  The amount collected has been insufficient in recent years to cover the full cost of the program, and accordingly the City has had to subsidize the street lighting fund from other sources. 

 

As I noted previously, the City shares the residents’ desire to replace the street lights that have been removed, but we face the joint challenge of finding the funds to pay for the replacement.  Although the City and the HOA disagree as to who bears responsibility for replacement of the street lights, we are trying to focus on a solution rather than arguing about the problem.  City staff has obtained cost estimates to replace the 132 poles that have been removed, and we are exploring various financing options.  We expect to meet again with the HOA and its attorneys within the next two weeks to discuss possible cost-sharing arrangements as well as a comprehensive program for removal and replacement of the remaining street lights.

 

We hope this gives you a more thorough understanding of the situation.

 

Sincerely,

 

Vickie A. Prosser, Aide to

Councilmember Jack Feller