| Sure. Agree. I'll tell Bethany to get back him and ask him for $150 for a full review/consultation. That should tell us something. If he pays, can you handle it? Neal A. Puckett, Esq LtCol, USMC (Ret) Puckett & Faraj, PC 1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210 Alexandria, VA 22314 703.706.9566 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Haytham Faraj wrote: I donât see why we should waste time on reviewing files without payment. I spend way too much time on Phillips over the weekend and others like him. If he wants us to review his file, he should pay for the time especially since t looks like Scott Jack and you have already reviewed it. From: Puckett Neal [mailto:neal@puckettfaraj.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:50 AM To: Faraj Haytham Subject: Fwd: Sakievich, BCNR OVERVIEW Partner, This comes to us by referral from Scott Jack. He emailed last week to tell me he gave the guy our contact info. I did a read through and it seems to me this guy was told "no" and just can't let it go. Can you give it a once-over and give him your opinion? N P.S. You and I are scheduled to receive $3000 gross vice $5000 gross this payday. We'll make it up if we can. Neal A. Puckett, Esq LtCol, USMC (Ret) Puckett & Faraj, PC 1800 Diagonal Rd, Suite 210 Alexandria, VA 22314 703.706.9566 The information contained in this electronic message is confidential, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that any use, distribution, copying of disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify Puckett & Faraj, P.C. at 703-706-9566 or via a return the e-mail to sender. You are required to purge this E-mail immediately without reading or making any copy or distribution. Begin forwarded message: Date: August 23, 2011 9:39:52 AM EDT Subject: FW: Sakievich, BCNR OVERVIEW This came in from the website, how do we want to handle these cases now? Bethany N. Trujillo Office Manager/Legal Secretary 1800 Diagonal Road, Suite 210 Alexandria, VA 22314 bethany@puckettfaraj.com (703) 706-9566 Phone (202) 318-7652 Fax DC × CA × MI × VA www.PuckettFaraj.com twitter.com/puckettfaraj Practice is limited to matters and proceedings before special courts - federal courts - agencies. Confidentiality / Privilege Notice: This transmission, including attachments, is intended solely for the use of the designated recipient(s). This transmission may contain information that is confidential and/or privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The use or disclosure of the information contained in this transmission for any purpose other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this transmission, please immediately destroy all copies received and notify the sender. -----Original Message----- From: Tom Sakievich [mailto:tsakievich@mac.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 6:44 AM To: info@puckettfaraj.com Cc: Scott Jack Subject: Sakievich, BCNR OVERVIEW Mr. Puckett or Mr. Faraj, Due to the active-duty reserve status nature of my concerns Scott Jack of Jacksonville, NC recommended I present my case to you. My intent is to review, challenge, and overturn a recent BCNR finding, then gain relief from significant losses. My 'discovery' of injustice occurred September 2010. The Board, in April 2011, as did the entity pinged by BCNR, HQMC (RA), either missed or disregarded key material pieces of evidence. The Board, instead, relied on HQMC (RA) opinion not germane to multiple issues that compelled my BCNR. To resolve, I first spoke with a retired Marine 06 JAG out of Florida; then met with Scott, via a mutual associate, Pete Collins. The first agreed that the Board was mis-directed and likely distracted but not hopeful as, once decided, a BCNR finding is rarely overturned. Before visiting over the phone I've attached here the outline of my original 'statement' for your review. If this is something we may be able to act on I'd would like to schedule a preliminary consultation. I'll then send a complete copy of all correspondence associated with this BCNR package. If not I'd appreciate it if you would redirect me to someone with this type of skill. In either case, I would like to briefly meet over the phone later this week or a suitable date soon thereafter. Looking forward to hearing back from you. Tom Sakievich LtCol USMC (ret) Spanish Fork, Utah |