RE: (Cynowa v. CSSS et al.) Plaintiff's Response Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment

["William F. Slater, III" <slater@billslater.com>]

Haytham,

Thanks.

I still believe that Justice Brandeis was correct:

"Sunlight is the best disinfectant."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Brandeis

Best regards,

Bill
William F. Slater, III, PMP
Chicago, IL
United States of America
slater@billslater.com
http://billslater.com
http://billslater.com/career
773 - 235 - 3080 - Home
312 - 758 - 0307 - Mobile

On Thu, March 3, 2011 7:31 am, Haytham Faraj wrote:
> In receipt.   Thank you.  I will review all of this and will be discussing
> it with you when we meet. I am about to enter my third week of a jury
> trial
> that was supposed to end early this week, hence my radio silence on the
> net.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William F. Slater, III [mailto:slater@billslater.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 8:03 PM
> To: Kevin Duff
> Cc: slater@billslater.com; 'Haytham'; 'John Murray'
> Subject: RE: (Cynowa v. CSSS et al.) Plaintiff's Response Brief in
> Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
>
> Kevin,
>
> Thanks and I understand.
>
> For Haytham's benefit, I have attached the document I reference.
>
> By the way, it could be VERY useful for you to know that Larry Carver
> called
> me while I was writing this document.  His personal instructions:
> "Pull out all the stops and BURY Nikiforis with everything you can add to
> the document."  So I did.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bill
> William F. Slater, III, PMP
> Chicago, IL
> United States of America
> slater@billslater.com
> http://billslater.com
> http://billslater.com/career
> 773 - 235 - 3080 - Home
> 312 - 758 - 0307 - Mobile
>
>
> On Wed, March 2, 2011 6:29 pm, Kevin Duff wrote:
>> Bill,
>>
>> Thanks for your email.  The focus for the summary judgment motion is
>> as we laid it out in our initial filing on January 19.  While the
>> manner in we you were treated may be helpful to understanding the
>> context of the events at issue as we prepare for trial, we do not want
>> to interject new material into the summary judgment analysis because
>> we do not want the Court to conclude that there is a dispute over the
>> facts that a jury must decide.
>>
>> I would be happy to discuss this with you tomorrow if you would like
>> to give me a call.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: William F. Slater, III [mailto:slater@billslater.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 6:12 PM
>> To: John Murray
>> Cc: kduff@rddlaw.net; 'Haytham'
>> Subject: Re: (Cynowa v. CSSS et al.) Plaintiff's Response Brief in
>> Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
>>
>> John,
>>
>> I have tried to explain in earlier occasions is that the things that
>> transpired up to and since the termination of Cynowa were a form of
>> "Workplace Mobbing."  (Them against me)
>>
>> http://www.mobbing-usa.com/
>>
>> Cynowa's behavior that led to his termination was his attempt to
>> establish himself as the leader of the gang there.  And also to show
>> that he had contempt for CSSS because the previous Program Manager,
>> Larry McKeehan, who was Chris' good buddy, was fired.
>>
>> It would be very instructive if you could gather evidence in the form
>> of e-mails, documents, and depositions, etc. that would show how much
>> I was hated, and subsequently trashed by these people.  Also go back
>> and look at the e-mails that I listed in the Appendix of my March 2007
>> 72-page response to CSSS regarding Nikoforis' Employee Dispute
>> Resolution against me.  These are e-mails written by the next
>> self-appointed leader of the gang there.  He wanted to have me kicked
>> out in retaliation for the fact that Cynowa was fired.
>>
>> Anyway, you folks need to see what is really going on here and how
>> Cynowa (and Carver) are using the legal system to finish what they
>> could not accomplish as a mob in the workplace.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> William F. Slater, III, PMP
>> Chicago, IL
>> United States of America
>> slater@billslater.com
>> http://billslater.com
>> http://billslater.com/career
>> 773 - 235 - 3080 - Home
>> 312 - 758 - 0307 - Mobile
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, March 2, 2011 4:32 pm, John Murray wrote:
>>> All:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Attached please find a copy of the Plaintiff's Response Brief in
>>> Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment.  We will begin
>>> on our reply brief in short order.  Please see attached.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> John E. Murray, Esq.
>>>
>>> Associate Attorney
>>>
>>> Rachlis Durham Duff & Adler, LLC
>>>
>>> 542 South Dearborn Street, Suite 900
>>>
>>> Chicago, IL 60605
>>>
>>> Office: (312) 733-3950
>>>
>>> Direct: (312) 275-0338
>>>
>>> Mobile: (810) 824-7197
>>>
>>> Fax: (312) 733-3952
>>>
>>> Email: jmurray@rddlaw.net
>>>
>>> Firm website: www.rddlaw.net
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> RACHLIS DURHAM DUFF & ADLER, LLC E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>
>>> This transmission may be: (1) subject to the Attorney-Client
>>> Privilege,
>>> (2)
>>> an attorney work product, or (3) strictly confidential. If you are
>>> not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose,
>>> print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received
>>> this in error, please reply and notify the sender (only) and delete
>>> the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation
>>> of federal criminal law.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>


--