---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Albert Moore <eingriff@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 1:22 AM
Subject: Macon
To:
neal@puckettfaraj.com
ALBERT W. L. MOORE, JR.
ATTORNEY
AT LAW
Central Professional Building
221 West Lexington, Suite 114
Independence, Missouri 64050-3719
816.461.0993
Telefacsimile:
816.461.3231
Email: eingriff@gmail.com
DATE: 23 October 2010
Neal
Puckett, Esq., Greetings,
I’m
not privy to your defense of LTC Terry Lakin, but I would like to suggest that Hawai’i’s
vital records are relevant and material for proving Barry’s eligibility at the
time of his birth, not his ineligibility. His withholding of these records gives currency to the myths that he was foreign-born to an alien father, either of
which would preclude his being a natural born U.S. citizen at the time of his
birth. Thus he gave American military officers good cause to surmise that he
was not constitutionally eligible to the Office of President under U.S. Const.
Art. II Sec. 1. It was eminently reasonable, therefore, that LTC Lakin and others
deemed their orders to be unlawful.
In an
effort to clarify, let me give you a hypothetical background scenario. Bear in
mind that from the outset I was open to the possibility that Stanley Ann Dunham
and Barack Hussein Obama an alien Luo tribesman were not Barry’s birth parents.
An unverified fixation that they are the birth parents has skewed nearly
everybody’s analysis, and led nearly everybody into false conclusions, such as
the Kenyan birth myth, which can not be scientifically verified.
Stanley
Armour Dunham so wanted a first born son that he named his daughter, born 29
November 1942, Stanley - Stanley Ann, as a concession to her gender. On 4
August 1961, he had his heart’s desire in Honolulu, a first born son by an
obliging predominantly Polynesian wahine. To give the bastard boy legitimacy
and keep him in the family, he was adopted by Stanley Ann and Stanley Armour’s
friend Barack Hussein Obama, an alien Luo tribesman, who joined in platonic matrimonial
union.
To
give further cover to the illegitimate birth, Stanley Ann left the island during
gestation and birth to conceal the fact that she was not pregnant. A story was
concocted that she had gone to Kenya for laying in and giving birth. When she
divorced Obama the Luo a couple of years later, a birth certificate had to be
submitted to the divorce court. A phony Kenyan birth certificate was made an
exhibit in the court proceeding (and withdrawn in normal course). This gave
another layer of cover to the Hawai’ian adoption.
The
Kenyan birth myth waxed and waned according to its utility. It might have been
useful in obtaining Barry’s admission to university, and procuring student aid
for him. Later, it was useful in garnering votes and portraying opponents as
racists. When Barry started running for the Office of President, the Kenyan birth
myth became an embarrassment, because foreign birth prevented one from being a
natural born citizen. Hence the myth was suppressed.
Currently,
the Kenyan birth myth is a useful diversion, to distract the public and
officials from the real citizenship issue, Barry’s loss of U.S. citizenship
after his birth. This message concentrates on his birth.
Nobody
can furnish scientific evidence that Barry is Stanley Ann’s son, and I’m
confident that genetic analysis would prove it biologically impossible. I’m
equally confident that such analysis would disprove Obama the black Luo
tribesman as Barry’s father.
Assume
that Hawai’i’s certification of live birth is true and official as far as it
goes. Assume also that Dr. Fukino is honest. These assumptions are reasonable
and verifiable. I’m not persuaded by kneejerk reactions that the COLB is a
forgery and Dr. Fukino a liar, even though she’s a Democrat. If Mr. Obama’s
birth parents were indeed Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama the alien
Luo tribesman, a prima facie case would be made out that Mr. Obama is not a
natural born U.S. citizen, because Obama the Luo tribesman was an alien.
But
the certification of live birth is ambiguous. This ambiguity arises from its
nature; it is an abstract of information from a document on file. However, the
document on file could be an original birth certificate naming birth parents,
or it could be an amended birth certificate reflecting adoptive parents.
When
a child is adopted, an amended birth certificate is created naming the adoptive
parents and creating an official fiction that they are the birth parents. Recently,
Thursday 23 September 2010, a lady came into my law office. A close relative of
hers was adopted; she had seen both the original and amended birth certificate
of the relative. This scenario is consistent with the hypothesis that DNA evidence
would disprove Stanley Ann and Obama the Luo as Barry’s parents, and confirm
the birth parents named in the original Hawai’ian birth certificate. (If the birth
father named in the original birth certificate can not be genetically
confirmed, DNA might prove Stanley Armour as the birth father; it’s possible
that the true identity of the father was misrepresented to the hospital or
birth attendant).
Hence
Hawai’i’s certification of Mr. Obama’s live birth in Hawai’i is intentionally
ambiguous. By design, it is impossible to tell from the certification whether
the purported parents named therein are Mr. Obama’s birth parents or his
adoptive parents. This is to keep adoptions confidential. Furnishing an amended
certificate would tip the observer to an adoption. Hawai’i’s custodians of
vital records are barred by law from divulging the adoption without the
adoptee’s consent, or pursuant to legal process.
However,
on 22 (or 27) July 2009, Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino,
director of the Hawai’i State Department of Health, issued a statement by which
she goes about as close to the brink as she can, without violating her legal
obligation to keep the adoption confidential, to tell us that Barry was
adopted. Her statement is quoted in the book "The Manchurian
President" on page 76, and below:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai'i State Department of Health,
have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai'i State
Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai'i and is
a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this
statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months
ago.”
It’s
amusing that the authors of that highly informative book “The Manchurian
President” fail to pick up on Dr. Fukino’s effort to disclose Mr. Obama’s
adoption without violating legal restraints; they say on page 77 that her
statement “told us nothing new.” In fact, it cracks the case.
Dr.
Fukino’s statement refers to Barry's "vital records" in the plural.
He was not dead, so she must be referring to two birth certificates, the
original that named birth parents and an amended certificate naming adoptive parents.
Moreover, data in the certification of live birth must have been taken from the
amended certificate, for Dr. Fukino also says that the records verify that Barry
is a "natural born American citizen." If the original birth
certificate showed Obama the Luo to be a birth parent, it would have proved the
opposite, that Barry was not a natural born citizen.
Dr.
Fukino is very clever. She has tipped us to an adoption without explicitly
disclosing an adoption, which would be unlawful. She has also let us know that Barry's
birth parents were U.S. citizens, which makes baby Barry a natural born U.S.
citizen at birth. (This leaves open the possibility that he lost American
citizenship thereafter.)
Mr.
Obama’s vital records must be disclosed and genetic analysis run to confirm the
birth parents of Barack Hussein Obama II, and to confirm that Mr. Obama,
pretender to the Office of President, is actually the child whose birth was
recorded, not a ringer.
But
if, as seems highly probable, Mr. Obama’s production of DNA and his vital
records would prove that, at birth, he was a natural born U.S. citizen, why
would he refuse to confirm it by his original birth certificate? He might
maintain that it would be to avoid family scandal and damage to the reputations
of others, or to prevent the disclosure of his own illegitimate origins. In all
probability, however, there are two main reasons:
- First, neither of Obama’s birth parents is
of recent African origin. Mr. Obama’s whole political career has been based on
being the son of a black Luo tribesman, with kith & kin in today’s Africa.
Mr. Obama’s gross misrepresentation that he is black is arguably election
fraud. An American black told Laura Ingraham the other day that a black will
forgive one many a fault if he's black. Wonder what they would think if he is,
for example, the son of a Caucasian father and a predominantly Polynesian
mother, with perhaps Portagee overtones, who just pretends to be black for
meretricious political purposes, never mind that it destroys the career of a
patriotic American Army officer.
I understand that Barry has threatened to
retaliate against members of the Court Martial if they subpoena Dr. Fukino and her
clearly relevant and material vital records (and presumably the DNA that would
exclude the slight risk that Barry’s a ringer). I know this is easier said than
done, but I hope (audaciously) that you will submit an offer of proof regarding
Hawai’i’s vital records and what Dr. Fukino’s testimony is likely to show, and
make a record of the exertion of command influence.
Even
better than making a record for appeal, however, would be for the Court Martial
members to suck it up, pull themselves together and take cognizance of the fact
that they are American officers sworn to uphold the Constitution of the United
States. They have not sworn the heilige Eid
to the person of Barry Obamanejahd. If they allow Barry to seduce, entrap and
destroy officers in this way, charges should in due course be brought against
members of the military tribunal. I am simply beside myself with fury at the
prospect that U.S. officers would allow themselves to be suborned by a probably
communist mole at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. There is a possibility that Barry
would be impeached and removed before he could wreak vengeance on the members of the Court Martial.
The importance to Mr.
Obama of the charade that he is black - his political minstrel show - should
not be underestimated. He has used it to con blacks and sympathetic people of
all shades to vote for him, while enabling him (often through proxies) to
denigrate opponents as racists. The significance of this fraud are shown by (1)
the fact that some 95% of blacks voted for Mr. Obama in 2008 (2) Mr. Obama's
refusal to disclose his DNA or vital records, which would probably confirm that
he was a natural born citizen at birth but would also disclose that he can not
truthfully claim the distinction of being the son of a Luo tribesman, with kith
'n' kin in Africa (3) his release of his otherwise confidential census return,
in which he claimed to be black (4) his political manifesto "Dreams from
my Father", subtitled "A Story of Race and Inheritance" and (5)
Aaron Klein's book with Brenda J. Elliott "The Manchurian Candidate",
which spells out Mr. Obama’s cynical use of his false racial heritage as the
foundation of Mr. Obama's political career.
Incidentally,
I’ve made it clear on the internet that Hawai’i’s vital records would show that
Barry was not only a bastard but a non-black bastard, so there is no good reason
for him to continue to maintain the twin fictions that he was born in Kenya as
the son of a black Luo tribesman. The word is out; the jig is up. Also, if he will
now disclose all his vital records and produce an adequate DNA sample, I will
recommend that this not be made a part of the bill of impeachment, which I hope
to help draft.
- Secondly, the Kenyan birth myth and other
false notions about Barry’s birth and its constitutional consequences divert
attention from his real citizenship problems, his probable loss of U.S.
citizenship by forfeiture, disclaimer, renunciation, sedition, some combination
of the foregoing, or otherwise. Barry is trying to replicate the experience of
Chester Alan Arthur, who was helped, in distracting attention from the fact
that his father William was not yet a U.S. citizen when Chester was born, by
successfully rebutting false charges that Chester himself was born outside the
U.S. By my hypothesis, Mr. Obama can prove eligibility at birth, but became
ineligible by loss of citizenship thereafter.
There
is little doubt that LTC Lakin and others would have obeyed their orders if
they knew there was an official birth certificate, verifiable by genetic
analysis, that Barry was at the time of his birth a natural born U.S. citizen.
Although subsequent loss of U.S. citizenship would have terminated the status
of natural born U.S. citizenship, that status at birth would have raised a presumption
it continued until subsequent loss of citizenship was proved. (The term “natural
born citizen” subsumes “citizen”. You can not be a natural born citizen if you
are not a citizen at all, even if you were a natural born citizen at birth.)
For
this political fraud, Barry is willing to incite mutiny and insubordination
among devoted patriots in the United States armed forces, who reasonably
refrain from obeying orders by a commander in chief who is to all appearances
constitutionally ineligible to the Office of President.
Can
you not make a case for reasonable reliance on a false and meretricious appearance
of ineligibility as a basis refusing an order as unlawful? Could not the Court
Martial receive Dr. Fukino’s testimony and exhibits under seal to determine secretly
that Barry was a natural born U.S. citizen at birth and the misrepresentations
of foreign birth to a foreign father excuse LTC Lakin for disobeying orders from
a commander in chief, who made himself out to be prima facie ineligible? Maybe LTC Lakin’s career can be saved, even
though the nation will not immediately get its due, proof of Barry’s natural
born U.S. citizenship at the time of his birth.
How
would it affect morale, good order, discipline and recruitment, for the Court
Martial to punish a soldier who refuses to obey an order for which there is not
only no clear authority, but ample evidence, which he can not disprove, that
there is no authority?
Would
you also join in urging federal and state legislatures and attorneys general to
investigate Barry’s birth and life history to confirm (probably) that he was
born a natural born U.S. citizen but lost U.S. citizenship thereafter? Even if
it be found that Barry did not lose U.S. citizenship, such investigation would
probably have collateral benefits, such as the following:
- proof of obstruction of justice by the destruction,
forgery, alteration or sequestration of evidence of Barry’s non-U.S.
citizenship in Indonesian, Pakistan and the United States. Bribery is possible,
especially in Indonesia and Pakistan. Rich space contracts to Indonesia might
be in large part consideration for Indonesian complicity in the corruption of
official records relating to Barry’s citizenship.
- proof of massive illegal campaign contributions to
Barry.
- proof of fraud in Barry’s applications for
admission to university and scholarship aid, such as affirmations of foreign
birth and foreign citizenship.
Please
call or write. I would appreciate the opportunity to talk with you.
Best regards, Albert W. L. Moore, Jr.