Fwd: Constitution & the Internet Paper

[Neal Puckett <neal@puckettfaraj.com>]

Should we just hire Doug as a paralegal?

Neal A. Puckett

LtCol, USMC (Ret)

Puckett & Faraj, PC

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Douglas Wacker <douglas.wacker@gmail.com>
Date: June 29, 2010 6:27:38 PM PDT
To: Haytham Faraj <haytham@puckettfaraj.com>, haythamf@gmail.com, Christian Hur <christian.hur@gmail.com>, Hur Capt Christian P <christian.hur@usmc.mil>
Cc: Neal Puckett <neal@puckettfaraj.com>, Ted Wacker <twacker@rcrlaw.net>
Subject: Fwd: Constitution & the Internet Paper

Gentlemen,

Here was the paper I wrote on 18 USC 2701 et seq. and Warshak v. US. The case was later overturned by the 6th Cir. en banc, and I'm not sure if it went to the Supreme Court or not. A quick Westlaw search would probably turn it up.

I know the case law isn't in my favor, but the arguments are still there.

-Doug

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Douglas Wacker <douglas.wacker@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:45 AM
Subject: Constitution & the Internet Paper
To: margaret_mckeown@ca9.uscourts.gov

Judge McKeown,

 

Here is the final draft of my paper, Is E-mail Protected? The Government's Use of Delay Tactics to Circumvent the Fourth Amendment: A Case Study of Warshak v. United States. I will also provide a hard copy to the Records Office.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Doug Wacker

--
Douglas S. Wacker
1723 1/2 Diamond St.
San Diego, CA 92109
858.401.9392

--
Douglas S. Wacker
1719 Adams Ave
San Diego, CA 92116
858.401.9392

<Constitution-Internet Paper (WACKER) 080502.doc>