For what it's worth: The prosecutor's office should not have much to heartburn considering Maj Martz was also offered as a potential detailed counsel in this case by the OIC LSSS just a few days ago. r/ pt -----Original Message----- From: Haytham Faraj [mailto:haytham@puckettfaraj.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 14:13 To: Martz Major Nicholas A Cc: Tafoya LtCol Patricio A Subject: Re: US v. Wuterich Wuterich will give consent. Please check with the prosecutor's office. Vr, Haytham Faraj 760-521-7934 Sent from my iPhone On Mar 24, 2010, at 1:57 PM, "Martz Major Nicholas A" <nicholas.martz@usmc.mil > wrote: > Haytham, > > LtCol Tafoya told me he was planning to detail me to Wuterich. > Before he does, though, he asked me to contact you and address some > concerns I had about being detailed to the case. As a summer funner > in 2006, I worked on the case on at least two occasions I can remember > with LtCol Sullivan, doing basic legal research on handwriting > examplars and some other stuff. I've also discussed the details of > the case at various times with LtCol Sullivan, LtCol Erickson, Maj > Gannon, Capt Hur and Capt Brooks. Capt Brooks actually worked for me > as a TC while I was STC at Legal Team Echo from 08-09. I spoke to my > state bar ethics hotline, and was told that in order to represent > Wuterich I would need two things: > > 1) Informed written consent from the prosecutor's office (here, > presumably the LT-C OIC or LSSS OIC) > > 2) Informed written consent from the accused indicating he understands > my relationship with the current prosecutors of Wuterich and my role > as a prosecutor. > > Can you check with SSgt Wuterich and see whether he'll give me > informed written consent to represent him in light of my involvement > with the LT-C prosecutors. > > Nick > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in or attached to > this message may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of > the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message may > also be privileged or otherwise protected by work-product immunity or > other legal rules. Unintended transmission does not > constitute a waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. > If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender > immediately and delete this email. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message, you are notified that improperly > disclosing, copying, or otherwise distributing the contents may > violate the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. s 552a) and result in > criminal penalties. To the extent the information contained in or > attached to this communication contains Privacy Act information, that > information is FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature