Haytham, Attached is the hearing transcript which
we received today. The Court’s approach on this was
interesting. He viewed the previous deposition as closed. He
allowed us to put on Carver as our witness in a new evidence deposition.
He said that we cannot cross examine him, but that we can impeach him. See
what you think, but I think you should keep this frame work in mind as you
prepare for the deposition. Also, FYI, I do not plan on sharing this
transcript with Carver or plaintiff’s counsel. I think it is
unlikely that plaintiff’s counsel will choose to pay for a copy of it on
their own. Kevin From: Nancy Bistany
[mailto:nbistany@sbcglobal.net] Good afternoon – Attached please find the final electronic
files for the motion before Judge Maddux on February 14, 2011. I have
also attached a color PDF of the reporter’s certificate. Please let me know if you need anything
further. Have a good afternoon. Nancy L.
Bistany, CSR, RPR, FCRR 312.280.0825 - 312.551.9192 - 312.415.8004 - Cell Bistany Reporting
Service Bistany Reporting
Service Schedule
on-line at www.bistanyreporting.com NOTICE OF
CONFIDENTIALITY: This communication, and any attachments
hereto and/or hyperlinks contained herein, is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to whom this communication is explicitly addressed and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient,
be aware that any use, dissemination, disclosure, distribution, forwarding or
copying of this communication (including attachments and/or hyperlinks, if any)
is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error,
please notify me immediately by replying to sender and then immediately
permanently delete all copies of this communication. |
Attachment:
csss021411mtsfinal.PDF
Description: Adobe PDF document
1 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS: 2 COUNTY OF C O O K ) 3 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION 4 5 CHRISTOPHER S. CYNOWA, ) ) 6 Plaintiff, ) ) 7 -vs- ) No. 08 L 000403 ) 8 CSSS, INC., (CLIENT SERVER ) SOFTWARE SOLUTION d/b/a ) 9 CSSS.NET), LISA WOLFORD, ) WILLIAM F. SLATER, ) 10 ) Defendants. ) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had in the above-entitled 18 matter before the HONORABLE WILLIAM D. MADDUX, Judge of 19 said Court, on February 14, 2011, commencing at the hour 20 of 11:17 a.m. 21 22 23 24 BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 2 1 PRESENT: 2 BY: MR. PETER V. BUSTAMANTE 3 150 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 690 Chicago, Illinois 60601 4 (312) 346-2072 pvbust@bustamantelaw.com 5 appeared on behalf of the Plaintiff; 6 7 RACHLIS DURHAM DUFF & ADLER, LLC BY: MR. KEVIN B. DUFF 8 MR. JOHN E. MURRAY 542 South Dearborn Street, Suite 900 9 Chicago, Illinois 60605 (312) 733-3390 10 kduff@rddlaw.net jmurray@rddlaw.net 11 appeared on behalf of the Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 3 1 (Proceedings in open court.) 2 MR. BUSTAMANTE: Good morning, your Honor. 3 Peter Bustamante on behalf of the plaintiff. 4 MR. DUFF: Good morning, your Honor. 5 Kevin Duff on behalf of the defendants. 6 MR. BUSTAMANTE: Your Honor, this is the 7 plaintiff's motion to quash a notice and a subpoena for 8 the continued evidence deposition of a Mr. Larry Carver. 9 Mr. Carver is a witness to this defamation 10 case, and his evidence deposition was taken in July of 11 2009. At that point, your Honor, over 150 pages of 12 testimony were taken. The defense had approximately 44 13 pages of cross-examination and at the end of that said, 14 that's all we have. Thereafter, there was a redirect and 15 a short recross. 16 Now they have issued a notice, attaching a 17 Cook County subpoena for a witness that lives in Virginia. 18 We don't even know if the witness is going to accept that 19 subpoena. And if he doesn't, how are they going to 20 enforce it? We will be forced to travel to Virginia for 21 naught based on this notice. The notice is also defective 22 in that it says it may be recorded by video. They don't 23 name the videographer. 24 They are, frankly, seeking to reopen BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 4 1 discovery -- I mean, not reopen testimony -- to reopen 2 testimony. And they haven't provided the Court with the 3 information of the facts upon which the Court can exercise 4 discretion to determine if this witness' testimony should 5 be reopened and, if so, into what areas. 6 For all those reasons, Judge, we ask that you 7 quash the notice and the subpoena for this witness. 8 MR. DUFF: Your Honor, Kevin Duff for the 9 defendants. 10 As Mr. Bustamante indicated, this was a 11 deposition that was taken as an evidence deposition in 12 July of 2009. At that time, this was the first deposed 13 witness in the entire case. 14 Subsequently we had 18 months of discovery, 15 and this case is set for trial on April 11, 2011. As I 16 say, most of all the discovery in this case took place 17 after Mr. Carver's deposition was noticed as an evidence 18 deposition and taken. And this was noticed at the 19 plaintiff's instance, not the defendants'. 20 At that time that we took -- that the 21 evidence deposition was taken, it was known by both sides 22 that the deposition had not been concluded. In fact, both 23 sides knew that there were questions that the witness had 24 refused to answer. BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 5 1 And on the record at the close of the 2 deposition, my associate who was present for the 3 deposition indicated that she was going to reserve the 4 right to recall the witness. And if your Honor would like 5 to see that on the record, I can show your Honor. So it 6 was clear to everybody that this deposition was not 7 completed. 8 And in addition to that, the effort here is 9 to try to foreclose -- 10 THE COURT: What's this witness' position in the 11 case? 12 MR. DUFF: The witness is a third party, your 13 Honor. 14 THE COURT: What's his involvement? 15 MR. DUFF: His involvement is he was a former top 16 manager of my corporate client defendant. And actually, 17 since the time he was deposed, we've come to develop our 18 understanding of what his significance to this case is, 19 including after the point he was deposed we learned that 20 he was providing confidential and privileged information 21 from one of the defendants to plaintiff's counsel. We 22 need an opportunity to ask him about that. 23 We also know that based on evidence that this 24 particular witness provided to plaintiff's counsel, a new BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 6 1 defendant was added to the case. 2 So, you know, the opportunity -- we're 3 talking about an evidence deposition. If plaintiff wishes 4 to make objections to any questions that we ask, they can 5 make that on the record or they can bring a motion in 6 limine. 7 We have 60 days before trial is going to take 8 place in this case. Yes, it's true that this witness is 9 out in Virginia, but we actually noticed the deposition to 10 take place in Virginia for the witness' convenience so he 11 wouldn't have to travel back to Illinois. In fact, this 12 witness already consented to the jurisdiction of this 13 Court, because when the evidence deposition was originally 14 taken, he voluntarily came to Illinois. 15 THE COURT: Did you serve an Illinois subpoena on 16 this witness? 17 MR. DUFF: Initially he was served with an Illinois 18 subpoena by the plaintiff's counsel in 2009. He accepted 19 that, came to Illinois, and his evidence deposition was 20 initiated. 21 THE COURT: Here? 22 MR. DUFF: Here. We have simply reissued a new -- 23 THE COURT: Have you been in touch with this 24 witness? BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 7 1 MR. DUFF: They are in touch with this witness. 2 THE COURT: How about you? 3 MR. DUFF: No, this witness hasn't communicated 4 with us. 5 MR. BUSTAMANTE: Judge, he did issue an Illinois 6 subpoena. It's an attachment to the motion. 7 One other thing I forgot, your Honor, is that 8 through the subpoena, they attached a rider duces tecum. 9 They're seeking to reopen discovery. 10 This witness is -- it's supposed to be an 11 evidence deposition testimony as in trial. They can't use 12 a subpoena duces tecum to bring new things that they never 13 obtained during a long period of discovery, which closed 14 January of this year, to get new information. 15 THE COURT: No, no, wait. They could do another 16 evidence deposition of the same witness as their witness. 17 MR. BUSTAMANTE: But they haven't done that. Yes, 18 you're right, they can do that, but that's not what 19 they're doing. They want to reopen -- 20 THE COURT: I thought they were going to take 21 another deposition. 22 MR. BUSTAMANTE: That's not what they want. 23 MR. DUFF: We are, your Honor. 24 THE COURT: Reopening or taking another dep? BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 8 1 MR. DUFF: Well, I'm not sure that that's a 2 meaningful distinction. 3 THE COURT: The other one -- it is. The other one 4 is over with, because there you could cross-examine. 5 MR. DUFF: And on the record in that -- 6 THE COURT: If you're calling him as your witness 7 for another deposition, you can do direct examination; you 8 can't cross. 9 MR. DUFF: Okay. On the record in the previous 10 deposition, we reserved the right to continue the 11 deposition. 12 THE COURT: I'm not sure you can do that. 13 MR. DUFF: Well, it was -- 14 THE COURT: What was the reason for reserving the 15 right to ask more questions? 16 MR. DUFF: Well, there were a few reasons. One, 17 that it was the end of the day, and the witness had to 18 return to Washington. 19 THE COURT: That's not good enough. What else? 20 MR. DUFF: In addition to that, the witness refused 21 to answer questions on the record that we reserved the 22 right to ask the Court to ask him to answer should he -- 23 THE COURT: Well, maybe he shouldn't have to. Have 24 we argued that out? BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 9 1 MR. DUFF: We haven't argued that, because we 2 didn't want to have to come in to the Court in a piecemeal 3 fashion. We wanted to finish the deposition and come back 4 to the Court. 5 THE COURT: Well, I haven't heard a good enough 6 reason to reopen the deposition yet. 7 MR. DUFF: Well, as I say, in addition to that 8 fact, you know, this witness -- as I indicated, this 9 evidence deposition was taken, you know, 18 months ago 10 before all the discovery in this case took place. You 11 know, we've discovered subsequently information that we 12 feel we need to be able to ask this witness about. 13 Now, you know, I think it would be 14 appropriate to allow us to continue the deposition which 15 was never concluded and on the record stating so, but if 16 your Honor is going to not allow us to do it in that 17 fashion, then absolutely we would like to call the witness 18 ourselves and ask him these points. 19 We need the opportunity, your Honor, to ask 20 this witness all the questions that we didn't ask him. 21 THE COURT: Yes, take another deposition. The 22 other one is closed. That's over. 23 MR. BUSTAMANTE: Thank you, your Honor. 24 MR. DUFF: So, your Honor, in terms of -- the BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 10 1 motion before the Court is to quash the subpoena that we 2 issued. My understanding is that's being denied. We can 3 take his deposition. 4 THE COURT: Uh-huh. 5 MR. DUFF: Thank you, your Honor. 6 THE COURT: The second thing is if you have an 7 impeachment that you can use on this witness -- 8 MR. DUFF: Absolutely. 9 THE COURT: -- the new rules seem to give you the 10 right to impeach the witness, even though you're calling 11 the witness, if it's damaging to your case. 12 MR. DUFF: I agree with that, your Honor. 13 MR. BUSTAMANTE: Your Honor, clarification, please. 14 This subpoena is for the continued evidence 15 deposition. 16 THE COURT: No, that's -- 17 MR. BUSTAMANTE: That's quashed? 18 THE COURT: -- not what we're doing. 19 MR. BUSTAMANTE: That's right. 20 THE COURT: He's going to be able to take an 21 evidence deposition to cover the points that he thinks he 22 wants to use this witness for. 23 MR. BUSTAMANTE: I understand that. He should 24 issue a new subpoena for that, because this subpoena is no BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 11 1 good, right? This is for the continued evidence 2 deposition -- 3 THE COURT: It's not enforceable. 4 MR. BUSTAMANTE: Okay. Very good. 5 THE COURT: The -- 6 MR. BUSTAMANTE: So motion to quash is granted, and 7 he can issue a new subpoena for whatever -- 8 THE COURT: Well, no. All you have to do is just 9 serve a notice for this deposition. 10 MR. DUFF: We did already. 11 THE COURT: Send that to the clerk of the 12 courthouse in Virginia, and they'll give you a number 13 where a subpoena can be issued, and that subpoena can be 14 issued and used on the person. 15 This is the Uniform Taking of Foreign 16 Depositions Act, nothing more than that. 17 MR. BUSTAMANTE: All right. Okay. 18 THE COURT: And it's a very simple process. And 19 what you do is you've got to hire a court reporter. I 20 used to just -- give this to the court reporter, who would 21 get the subpoena served and make that a part of their 22 charge, you see. 23 MR. DUFF: Just for clarification of our record, 24 your Honor, the motion that was up this morning was to BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 12 1 quash the subpoena. I understand that you're denying that 2 because it's with respect to -- in other words, we are not 3 foreclosed from taking this witness' new deposition. 4 THE COURT: Okay. You can go ahead and operate on 5 the subpoena that you've done. But if the witness doesn't 6 appear, they travel to Virginia, and you're going to have 7 to pay their legal fees and their travel expenses for a 8 deposition that doesn't go ahead. 9 MR. DUFF: I understand. We're not going to do 10 that, obviously. We're going to -- 11 THE COURT: If you have a local subpoena served, 12 then you're going to be insulated from the witness not 13 appearing, and he's not going to be able to charge you 14 with funds. 15 MR. DUFF: No, I agree. That's the way we'll 16 proceed. 17 THE COURT: Okay. 18 MR. BUSTAMANTE: Thank you, your Honor. 19 MR. DUFF: Thank you, your Honor. 20 (Proceedings concluded.) 21 22 23 24 BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825 13 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) 2 ) SS: 3 COUNTY OF C O O K ) 4 5 6 7 I, NANCY L. BISTANY, a Certified Shorthand 8 Reporter of the State of Illinois, do hereby certify that 9 I reported in shorthand the proceedings had at the hearing 10 aforesaid, and that the foregoing is a true, complete and 11 correct transcript of the proceedings of said hearing as 12 appears from my stenographic notes so taken and 13 transcribed under my personal direction. 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereunto set my hand 15 February 21, 2011, at Chicago, Illinois. 16 17 18 19 Certified Shorthand Reporter 20 Registered Professional Reporter 21 Federal Certified Realtime Reporter 22 CSR No. 84-1857 23 24 BISTANY REPORTING SERVICE (312) 280-0825
Attachment:
2-14-11_rprt_crt.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
csss021411mtsfinal_4PP.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
csss021411mtsfinal_F.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document